Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33416972›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2021

Polyphasic Characterization of Plant Growth Promoting Cellulose Degrading Bacteria Isolated from Organic Manures.

Devendra Jain, Ravina, Ali Asger Bhojiya, Surya Chauhan, Deepak Rajpurohit, Santosh R Mohanty

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Devendra JainDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, 313001, India. devendrajain@mpuat.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4345-1536
RavinaDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, 313001, India.
Ali Asger BhojiyaDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, 313001, India.
Surya ChauhanDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, 313001, India.
Deepak RajpurohitDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, 313001, India.
Santosh R MohantyIndian Institute of Soil Science, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, 462038, India.
Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology · INIndian Institute of Soil Science · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present study, twenty seven cellulose-degrading bacteria (CDB) were isolated from various organic manures and their cellulolytic activities were determined. The bacterial isolate CDB-26 showed the highest cellulolytic index, released 0.507 ± 0.025 mg/ml glucose and produced 0.196 ± 0.014 IU/ml cellulase enzyme under in vitro conditions. Biochemically, all the 27 isolates showed difference in the 6 biochemical tests performed. Further, all the 27 CDB isolates were subjected to various plant growth-promoting activities, and all CDB strains were positive for IAA production, GA

Indexed as

CelluloseManurePlant DevelopmentStenotrophomonasCelluloseManure

Identifiers

PMID33416972
OpenAlexW3118953425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.