Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33416966›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2021

Sacral neuromodulation: troubleshooting needle placement.

Whitney K Hendrickson, Cindy L Amundsen

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Whitney K HendricksonDivision of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, 5324 McFarland Drive, Unit 310, Durham, NC, 27707, USA. whendric09@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4603-2879
Cindy L AmundsenDivision of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, 5324 McFarland Drive, Unit 310, Durham, NC, 27707, USA.

Funding

School of Medicine, Duke University (US) Roy T. Parker, M.D. Endowment within the Department of OBGYN
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe objective was to develop an instructional video that utilizes fluoroscopic images and anatomical landmarks to increase the surgeon's ability to troubleshoot optimal placement of the foramen needle and lead during a stage I sacral neuromodulation (SNM) procedure.

methodsEight different examples of suboptimal foramen needle placement with subsequent corrections during a SNM procedure were performed and recorded on a fresh female cadaver.

resultsFluoroscopic images were obtained during the procedure, and illustrations of the posterior aspect of the sacrum highlighting the S3 foramina and nerve are shown for anatomical comparison.

conclusionsThis video demonstrates how to efficiently identify and correct suboptimal foramen needle placement in order to obtain optimal lead placement during an SNM procedure. Understanding the relationship between the bony landmarks on fluoroscopy and the S3 nerve and foramen are important in order to understand how to correct a suboptimal foramen needle and thus achieve optimal lead placement.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapySacrumCadaverFemaleHumansFecal incontinenceOptimal lead placementOveractive bladderSacral neuromodulationSacral neurostimulationUrgency incontinenceUrinary retention

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.