Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33416958›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2021

Survey by the French Medicine Agency (ANSM) of the imaging protocol, detection rate, and safety of

Yanna-Marina Chevalme, Lotfi Boudali, Mathieu Gauthé, Caroline Rousseau, Andrea Skanjeti, Charles Merlin, Philippe Robin, Anne-Laure Giraudet, Marc Janier, Jean-Noël Talbot

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Phase III Study ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Head-to-Head Comparison of [Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. From radiotracer to radiopharmaceutical: a philosophical approach.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pattern of Prostate Cancer Recurrence Assessed byJournal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Yanna-Marina ChevalmeDirection des médicaments en oncologie, hématologie, transplantation, néphrologie, thérapie cellulaire, produits sanguins, et radiopharmaceutiques, Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des produits de santé (ANSM), 143 Bd Anatole, F93200, St Denis, France. yanna.chevalme@ansm.sante.fr.
Lotfi BoudaliDirection des médicaments en oncologie, hématologie, transplantation, néphrologie, thérapie cellulaire, produits sanguins, et radiopharmaceutiques, Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des produits de santé (ANSM), 143 Bd Anatole, F93200, St Denis, France.
Mathieu GauthéService de médecine nucléaire, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Caroline RousseauNuclear Medicine Unit, ICO René Gauducheau, CNRS, Inserm, CRCINA, Nantes University, F-44000, Nantes, France.
Andrea SkanjetiNuclear Medicine Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, EA 3738, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Charles MerlinNuclear Medicine Department, Cancer Center Jean PERRIN, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Philippe RobinService de Médecine Nucléaire, EA 3878 (GETBO), Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Brest, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.
Anne-Laure GiraudetNuclear Medicine Department LUMEN, Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France.
Marc JanierNuclear Medicine Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, EA 3738, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Jean-Noël TalbotService de médecine nucléaire, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest · FRCentre Jean Perrin · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHôpital Tenon · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite growing evidence of a superior diagnostic performance of PATIENTS AND

methodsSix centres performed

results(1) The overall PR was 68%; for a median serum PSA level (sPSA) of 1.7 ng/mL, an oligometastatic pattern (1-3 foci) was observed in 31% of the cases overall; (2) PR was significantly related to sPSA (from 41% if < 0.2 ng/mL to 81% if ≥ 2 ng/mL), to patients' age, to initial therapy (64% if prostatectomy vs. 85% without prostatectomy due to frequent foci in the prostate fossa), to whether FCH PET/CT was negative or equivocal (PR = 62% vs. 82%), and to previous BCR (PR = 63% for 1st BCR vs. 72% in case of previous BCR); (3) no significant difference in PR was found according to the imaging protocol: injected activity, administration of a contrast agent and/or of furosemide, dose length product, one single or multiple time points of image acquisition; (4) no adverse event was reported after PSMA-11 injection, even associated with a contrast agent and/or furosemide.

conclusionCompared with the performance of PSMA-11 PET/CT in BCR reported independently of FCH PET/CT in 6 large published series (n > 200), the selection based on FCH PET/CT resulted in no difference of PSMA-11 PR for sPSA < 1 ng/mL but in a slightly lower PR for sPSA ≥ 1 ng/mL, probably because FCH performs rather well at this sPSA and very occult BCR was over-represented in our cohort. An oligometastatic pattern paving the way to targeted therapy was observed in one fourth to one third of the cases, according to the clinico-biochemical context of the BCR. Systematic dual or triple acquisition time points or administration of a contrast agent and/or furosemide did not bring a significant added value for PSMA-11 PET/CT positivity and should be decided on individual bases.

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsCholineFranceGallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstate-Specific AntigenCholinefluorocholinegallium 68 PSMA-11Gallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesProstate-Specific Antigen18F-Fluorocholine (FCH)68Ga-PSMA-11Biochemical recurrence of prostate cancerDetection rateEvaluation of diagnostic strategyPSA serum level

Identifiers

PMID33416958
PMCPMC8263442
OpenAlexW3120675559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.