ReviewDer Pathologe2021
[The updated S2k guideline for the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis : Essential aspects for pathology].
Review in Der Pathologe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a specific form of chronic progressive fibrosing nonreversible interstitial lung disease of largely unknown origin. In high-resolution computer tomography (HRCT) and histopathology it presents with a UIP pattern. To diagnose IPF, (i) an ILD of known origin must be excluded (e.g., hypersensitivity pneumonitis, lung involvement in autoimmune or other systemic disease, and drug-induced ILD) and either (ii) the presence of a UIP pattern in HRCT or (iii) specific combinations of HRCT and histopathology is necessary. The diagnosis of IPF requires interdisciplinary collaboration and a structured procedure. The updated S2k guideline focuses on the IPF diagnostic process and describes the criteria of a UIP pattern in HRCT and histopathology that are differentiated into the categories "UIP pattern," "probable UIP pattern," "indetermined for UIP," and "alternative pattern." Depending on the anamnestic, clinical and serologic findings, HRCT, and - if acquired - histomorphology features, an algorithm to diagnose the IPF is recommended. If a UIP pattern in HRCT is present, IPF can still be diagnosed without further bioptic examination. Additionally, recommendations for the use of surgical lung biopsy (SLB), transbronchial lung biopsy, and the relatively new transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) procedure are provided. In contrast to the international guideline, the S2k guideline group evaluated TBLC based on recent studies to be advantageous compared to the SLB, as the diagnostic value and the side-effect rate was assessed to be acceptable and more patients with progressed ILD can be biopsied by TBLC. It is therefore expected that by using TBLC the rate of unclassifiable ILDs can be reduced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.