Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33416910›Full record

ArticleHNO2021

[Ultrasound-guided minimally invasive diagnostics and treatment in the head and neck area].

A Bozzato, C Neubert, Y Yeter

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in HNO, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A BozzatoUKS - Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrbergerstraße, Gebäude 6, 66421, Homburg, Deutschland. Alessandro.bozzato@uks.eu.
C NeubertUKS - Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrbergerstraße, Gebäude 6, 66421, Homburg, Deutschland.
Y YeterUKS - Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrbergerstraße, Gebäude 6, 66421, Homburg, Deutschland.
Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumoral lesions in the head and neck region represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in otorhinolaryngologic routine. High-resolution ultrasound is usually able to guide diagnosis. Nevertheless, a definite differentiation between benign and malignant lesions can only be achieved by tissue biopsy. The various options for obtaining samples for histopathological or cytological examination-from minimally invasive ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy to punch biopsy and open surgical biopsy-will be discussed in the first part along with the associated advantages and disadvantages. In the second part of this CME article, minimally invasive ultrasound-guided therapeutic options in the head and neck region which can be performed on an outpatient basis are depicted.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsHeadHumansNeckUltrasonographyUltrasonography, InterventionalAblation techniquesBotulinum toxinsCore needle biopsyLymphangiomaNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID33416910
OpenAlexW3119151703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.