ArticleAnnals of hematology2021
Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with myeloid sarcoma: a single center retrospective study.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes of critically ill pediatric patients after haploidentical stem cell transplantation.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Clinical and Molecular Characterization of Myeloid Sarcoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2025Review
- Outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation versus intensive chemotherapy in patients with myeloid sarcoma: a nationwide representative multicenter study.Bone marrow transplantation · 2025Article
- A novel reduced toxicity conditioning regimen for older myelodysplastic neoplasms patients undergoing haploidentical stem cell transplantation: a prospective cohort study.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
- Bronchial myeloid sarcoma secondary to acute monoblastic leukemia (AML-M5): a rare Case Report.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- De novo myeloid sarcoma mimicking gynecological tumors: a retrospective case series of eight patients.BMC women's health · 2023Article
- Clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of 118 cases of myeloid sarcoma.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has been regarded as a potential strategy for myeloid sarcoma (MS). The previous reports focused mainly on matched sibling donor (MSD) or matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplantation. There are no reports on haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT) in MS. We retrospectively reviewed 14 MS patients who underwent haplo-HSCT. All patients achieved complete donor engraftment. The median time for neutrophil engraftment and platelet engraftment were 10 (12-21) days and 18 (8-31) days. The 100-day cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and 3-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD were 37.7% (95%CI, 23.2-52.1%) and 35.7% (95%CI, 22.2-49.2%). Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation was documented in 86% patients, and only one patient developed CMV pneumonia. Treatment-related mortality occurred in one (7%) patient. The 1- and 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 21.4% (95%CI, 11.8-31.1%) and 35.7% (95%CI, 22.4-49.0%). The probability of overall survival at 1 and 3 years was 71.4% (95%CI, 51.3-99.5%) and 64.3% (95%CI, 43.5-95.0%), respectively. The probability of disease-free survival at 1 and 3 years was 71.4% (95%CI, 51.3-99.5%) and 57.1% (95%CI, 36.3-89.9%), respectively. In conclusion, haplo-HSCT is a feasible method for patients with MS who have no MSD or MUD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.