ArticleJMIR medical education2021
Impact Evaluation of the Kenya Frontline Field Epidemiology Training Program: Repeated-Measures Study.
Article in JMIR medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strengthening field epidemiology capacity in Canada: a mixed-methods evaluation of the Canadian field epidemiology program.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Scoping review of public health emergency management training programmes and curricula in Africa (2000-2025): implications for policy, practice and research.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Building epidemiological capacity to strengthen health systems: evaluating the advanced (extended) field epidemiology training program of Papua New Guinea.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Evaluating the impact of field epidemiology training programs: a descriptive review of the published literature.Human resources for health · 2025Review
- Development of an impact evaluation framework and planning tool for field epidemiology training programs.Human resources for health · 2025Article
- Field Epidemiology Training Programs (FETP) in the Eastern Mediterranean Region and Bangladesh: graduates' skills application, career advancement, and continuing education needs.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Evaluation of field epidemiology training programs: a scoping review.Frontiers in epidemiology · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the blended public health empowerment program-basic field epidemiology in the Eastern Mediterranean Region.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Ethiopia's field epidemiology training program - frontline: perspectives of implementing partners.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the public health empowerment program in the Eastern Mediterranean region.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- A comparative cross-sectional evaluation of the Field Epidemiology Training Program-Frontline in Ethiopia.BMC public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn 2014, Kenya's Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program (FELTP) initiated a 3-month field-based frontline training, Field Epidemiology Training Program (FETP-F), for local public health workers.
objectiveThis study aimed to measure the effect of FETP-F on participant workplace practices regarding quality and consistency of public health data, critical interaction with public health data, and improvements in on-time reporting (OTR).
methodsBetween February and April 2017, FELTP conducted a mixed methods evaluation via online survey to examine outcomes achieved among all 215 graduates from 2014 and 2015. Data quality assessment (DQA) and data consistency assessment (DCA) scores, OTR percentages, and ratings of the training experience were the quantitative measures tracked from baseline and then at 6-month intervals up to 18 months postcompletion of the training. The qualitative component consisted of semistructured face-to-face interviews and observations. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Qualitative data were transcribed and analyzed to identify key themes and dimensions.
resultsIn total, 103 (47%) graduates responded to the survey. Quantitative analyses showed that the training significantly increased the mean DQA and OTR scores but there was a nonsignificant increase in mean DCA scores. Qualitative analyses found that 68% of respondents acquired new skills, 83% applied those skills to their day-to-day work, and 91% improved work methods.
conclusionsFETP-F improved overall data quality and OTR at the agency level but had minimal impact on data consistency between local, county, and national public health agencies. Participants reported that they acquired practical skills that improved data collation and analysis and OTR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.