Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33416507›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2021

Impact Evaluation of the Kenya Frontline Field Epidemiology Training Program: Repeated-Measures Study.

Zeinab Gura Roka, Elvis Omondi Oyugi, Jane Njoki Githuku, Evalyne Kanyina, Mark Obonyo, Victor Omballa, Waqo Gufu Boru, James Ransom

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zeinab Gura Roka *Ministry of Health, Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1690-9556
Elvis Omondi Oyugi *Ministry of Health, National Malaria Program, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9049-0386
Jane Njoki Githuku *Ministry of Health, Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2932-0772
Evalyne Kanyina *Ministry of Health, Emergency Operations Centre, Directorate of Public Health, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0574-2348
Mark Obonyo *Food and Agriculture Organization, United Nations, Subregional Office of Southern Africa, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9369-5336
Victor Omballa *Bioreference Laboratories, Elmwood Park, NJ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2984-3012
Waqo Gufu Boru *Ministry of Health, Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2587-1972
James Ransom *Piret Partners Consulting, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6528-3994
Ministry of Health · KEWorld Health Organization - Zimbabwe · ZW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2014, Kenya's Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program (FELTP) initiated a 3-month field-based frontline training, Field Epidemiology Training Program (FETP-F), for local public health workers.

objectiveThis study aimed to measure the effect of FETP-F on participant workplace practices regarding quality and consistency of public health data, critical interaction with public health data, and improvements in on-time reporting (OTR).

methodsBetween February and April 2017, FELTP conducted a mixed methods evaluation via online survey to examine outcomes achieved among all 215 graduates from 2014 and 2015. Data quality assessment (DQA) and data consistency assessment (DCA) scores, OTR percentages, and ratings of the training experience were the quantitative measures tracked from baseline and then at 6-month intervals up to 18 months postcompletion of the training. The qualitative component consisted of semistructured face-to-face interviews and observations. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Qualitative data were transcribed and analyzed to identify key themes and dimensions.

resultsIn total, 103 (47%) graduates responded to the survey. Quantitative analyses showed that the training significantly increased the mean DQA and OTR scores but there was a nonsignificant increase in mean DCA scores. Qualitative analyses found that 68% of respondents acquired new skills, 83% applied those skills to their day-to-day work, and 91% improved work methods.

conclusionsFETP-F improved overall data quality and OTR at the agency level but had minimal impact on data consistency between local, county, and national public health agencies. Participants reported that they acquired practical skills that improved data collation and analysis and OTR.

Indexed as

field epidemiologyKenyatrainingworkforce development

Identifiers

PMID33416507
PMCPMC7822718
OpenAlexW3091931243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.