Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33416500›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2021

Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Improving Cognition in Patients With Alzheimer Disease: Protocol for a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Zahra Moussavi, Grant Rutherford, Brian Lithgow, Colleen Millikin, Mandana Modirrousta, Behzad Mansouri, Xikui Wang, Craig Omelan, Lesley Fellows, Paul Fitzgerald and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02908815 (Investigating the Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02908815 nacompletednot on this map

Investigating the Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) as a Treatment for Alzheimer's Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ManitobaRan2016 to 2022Enrolled200ConditionsAlzheimer's DiseaseArmsrTMS active treatment, rTMS sham treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zahra Moussavi *Biomedical Engineering Program, The University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9202-949X
Grant Rutherford *Biomedical Engineering Program, The University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1511-9675
Brian Lithgow *Biomedical Engineering Program, The University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4631-9485
Colleen Millikin *Department of Clinical Health Psychology, Max Rady College of Medicine, The University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3228-308X
Mandana Modirrousta *Department of Psychiatry, Max Rady College of Medicine, The University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3247-326X
Behzad Mansouri *Vision and Concussion-iScope Clinic, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5913-2989
Xikui Wang *Warren Centre for Actuarial Studies and Research, I H Asper School of Business, The University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4157-396X
Craig Omelan *Department of Psychiatry, Max Rady College of Medicine, The University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7558-861X
Lesley Fellows *Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9144-092X
Paul Fitzgerald *Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4217-8096
Lisa Koski *Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4135-5567
University of Manitoba · CAMcGill University · CAMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlzheimer disease has no known cure. As existing pharmacologic interventions only modestly slow cognitive decline, there is a need for new treatments. Recent trials of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) have reported encouraging results for improving or stabilizing cognition in patients diagnosed with Alzheimer dementia. However, owing to small samples and lack of a well-controlled double-blind design, the results to date are inconclusive. This paper presents the protocol for a large placebo-controlled double-blind study designed with sufficient statistical rigor to measure the efficacy of rTMS treatment in patients with Alzheimer dementia.

objectiveThe objectives are to (1) recruit and enroll up to 200 eligible participants, (2) estimate the difference in treatment effects between active treatment and sham treatment, (3) estimate the difference in treatment effects between two doses of rTMS applications, (4) estimate the duration of treatment effects among responders to active rTMS treatment, and (5) estimate the effect of dementia severity on treatment outcomes among patients receiving active rTMS treatment.

methodsWe have designed our study to be a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial investigating the short- and long-term (up to 6 months) benefits of active rTMS treatment at two doses (10 sessions over 2 weeks and 20 sessions over 4 weeks) compared with sham rTMS treatment. The study will include patients aged ≥55 years who are diagnosed with Alzheimer disease at an early to moderate stage and have no history of seizures and no major depression. The primary outcome measure is the change in the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale score from pretreatment to posttreatment. Secondary outcomes are changes in performance on tests of frontal lobe functioning (Stroop test and verbal fluency), changes in neuropsychiatric symptoms (Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire), and changes in activities of daily living (Alzheimer Disease Co-operative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory). Tolerability of the intervention will be assessed using a modification of the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication. We assess participants at baseline and 3, 5, 8, 16, and 24 weeks after the intervention.

resultsAs of November 1, 2020, we have screened 523 individuals, out of which 133 were eligible and have been enrolled. Out of the 133 individuals, 104 have completed the study. Moreover, as of November 1, 2020, there has been no serious adverse event. We anticipate that rTMS will considerably improve cognitive function, with effects lasting up to 3 months. Moreover, we expect rTMS to be a well-tolerated treatment with no serious side effect.

conclusionsThis protocol design will allow to address both the rTMS active treatment dose and its short- and long-term effects compared with sham treatment in large samples.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02908815; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02908815. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/25144.

Indexed as

Alzheimer diseasedouble blindplacebo controlledrandomizedrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationtreatment

Identifiers

PMID33416500
PMCPMC7822717
OpenAlexW3109367982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.