Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33416134›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular medicine2021

Nanobodies targeting immune checkpoint molecules for tumor immunotherapy and immunoimaging (Review).

Sheng Yu, Gui Xiong, Shimei Zhao, Yanbo Tang, Hua Tang, Kaili Wang, Hongjing Liu, Ke Lan, Xiongjie Bi, Siliang Duan

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Nanobodies: Robust miniprotein binders in biomedicine.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sheng YuDepartment of Medicine, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 545005, P.R. China.
Gui XiongDepartment of Medicine, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 545005, P.R. China.
Shimei ZhaoDepartment of Medicine, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 545005, P.R. China.
Yanbo TangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 545001, P.R. China.
Hua TangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Second Clinical Medical College of Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 545006, P.R. China.
Kaili WangDepartment of Medicine, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 545005, P.R. China.
Hongjing LiuDepartment of Medicine, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 545005, P.R. China.
Ke LanDepartment of Medicine, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 545005, P.R. China.
Xiongjie BiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 545001, P.R. China.
Siliang DuanDepartment of Medicine, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 545005, P.R. China.
Guangxi University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The immune checkpoint blockade is an effective strategy to enhance the anti‑tumor T cell effector activity, thus becoming one of the most promising immunotherapeutic strategies in the history of cancer treatment. Several immune checkpoint inhibitor have been approved by the FDA, such as anti‑CTLA‑4, anti‑PD‑1, anti‑PD‑L1 monoclonal antibodies. Most tumor patients benefitted from these antibodies, but some of the patients did not respond to them. To increase the effectiveness of immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint blockade therapies, miniaturization of antibodies has been introduced. A single‑domain antibody, also known as nanobody, is an attractive reagent for immunotherapy and immunoimaging thanks to its unique structural characteristic consisting of a variable region of a single heavy chain antibody. This structure confers to the nanobody a light molecular weight, making it smaller than conventional antibodies, although remaining able to bind to a specific antigen. Therefore, this review summarizes the production of nanobodies targeting immune checkpoint molecules and the application of nanobodies targeting immune checkpoint molecules in immunotherapy and immunoimaging.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyNeoplasmsSingle-Domain AntibodiesAnimalsHumansNeoplasm ProteinsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasm ProteinsSingle-Domain Antibodiesimmune checkpoint inhibitorimmunoimagingimmunotherapynanobodynoninvasive imaging

Identifiers

PMID33416134
PMCPMC7797440
OpenAlexW3111104764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.