Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33416050›Full record

ArticleEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2021

Performing elective cardiac invasive procedures during the COVID-19 outbreak: a position statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI).

Alaide Chieffo, Giuseppe Tarantini, Christoph Kurt Naber, Emanuele Barbato, Marco Roffi, Giulio G Stefanini, Gill Louise Buchanan, Piotr Buszman, Raúl Moreno, Barbara Zawiślak and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. EAPCI Presidential "criss-cross".EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Remote proctoring for high-risk coronary interventions with mechanical circulatory support during COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 20 institutions in 13 countries.

Alaide ChieffoInterventional Cardiology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe Tarantini
Christoph Kurt Naber
Emanuele Barbato
Marco Roffi
Giulio G Stefanini
Gill Louise Buchanan
Piotr Buszman
Raúl Moreno
Barbara Zawiślak
Guillaume Cayla
Haim Danenberg
Joao Antonio Brum Da Silveira
Holger Nef
Stefan K James
Josepa Mauri Ferre
Michiel Voskuil
Nils Witt
Stephan Windecker
Andreas Baumbach
Dariusz Dudek
Jagiellonian University · PLAndrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University · PLCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes · FRCentro de Investigación en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares · ESCentro Hospitalar do Porto · PTCumberland Infirmary · GBFederico II University Hospital · ITGeneva College · USHospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol · ESHumanitas University · ITIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San RaffaeleKarolinska Institutet · SEKlinikum Wilhelmshaven · DEUniversitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg · DEUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity Medical Center · USUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Padua · ITUppsala University Hospital · SEWilliam Harvey Research Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rearrangement of healthcare services required to face the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to a drastic reduction in elective cardiac invasive procedures. We are already facing a "second wave" of infections and we might be dealing during the next months with a "third wave" and subsequently new waves. Therefore, during the different waves of the COVID-19 pandemic we have to face the problems of how to perform elective cardiac invasive procedures in non-COVID patients and which patients/procedures should be prioritised. In this context, the interplay between the pandemic stage, the availability of healthcare resources and the priority of specific cardiac disorders is crucial. Clear pathways for "hot" or presumed "hot" patients and "cold" patients are mandatory in each hospital. Depending on the local testing capacity and intensity of transmission in the area, healthcare facilities may test patients for SARS-CoV-2 infection before the interventional procedure, regardless of risk assessment for COVID-19. Pre-hospital testing should always be conducted in the presence of symptoms suggestive of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In cases of confirmed or suspected COVID-19 positive patients, full personal protective equipment using FFP 2/N95 masks, eye protection, gowning and gloves is indicated during cardiac interventions for healthcare workers. When patients have tested negative for COVID-19, medical masks may be sufficient. Indeed, individual patients should themselves wear medical masks during cardiac interventions and outpatient visits.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular Surgical ProceduresCOVID-19Elective Surgical ProceduresPandemicsHumansMasksPersonal Protective EquipmentSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33416050
PMCPMC9724975
OpenAlexW3120585482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.