ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2021
Effect of substitution of chemical fertilizer by bioinoculants on plant performance and rhizospheric bacterial community: case study with Cajanus cajan.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhanced biological nitrogen fixation and nodulation in alfalfa through the synergistic interactions between Sinorhizobium meliloti and Priestia aryabhattai.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Bacterial inoculants as effective agents in minimizing the non-target impact of azadirachtin pesticide and promoting plant growth of Vigna radiata.Archives of microbiology · 2022Article
- Plant Growth Promoting Bacterial Consortium Induces Shifts in Indigenous Soil Bacterial Communities and Controls Listeria monocytogenes in Rhizospheres of Cajanus cajan and Festuca arundinacea.Microbial ecology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Improper nutrient management is one of the major limitations linked with cultivation of Cajanus cajan. This calls for an urgent need for a promising alternative, employing both bioinoculants and chemical fertilizer. Present study attempted to understand the impact of bioinoculants {Azotobacter chroococcum, Bacillus megaterium, and Pseudomonas fluorescens (ABP)} as their mono-inoculations, triple-inoculation, and their combination with different doses of fertilizer on (a) plant parameters, (b) soil nitrogen (N) economy, (c) resident bacterial community, (d) genes and transcripts involved in N cycle, and to evaluate the extent to which fertilizer could be replaced by ABP without compromising on grain yield. Bradyrhizobium sp. was used in all the treatments (as it was recommended for C. cajan). Combined application of bioinoculants and 75% of recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) led to 1.28-fold enhancement in grain yield as compared to RDF alone. Apart from exerting a positive impact on grain yield, the combined application of ABP and fertilizer led to an improvement in soil fertility, and modified the culturable rhizospheric bacterial community involved in N cycle. Integrated use of bioinoculants and fertilizer led to better N substrate utilization and hence, metabolic diversity when compared with application of fertilizer alone. An increase in the transcripts of nifH gene at the harvest stage in the soil treated with ABP alone and its combination with fertilizer, over individual treatment with fertilizer was observed. The combined use of ABP and fertilizer shaped the resident bacterial community towards a more beneficial community, which helped in increasing soil nitrogen turnover and hence, soil fertility as a whole.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.