Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33415631›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Spontaneous abortion in women occupationally exposed to inhalational anesthetics: a critical systematic review.

Lara A Oliveira, Regina P El Dib, Drielle B S Figueiredo, Leandro G Braz, Mariana G Braz

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Lara A OliveiraDepartment of Anesthesiology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University - UNESP, Professor Mário Rubens G. Montenegro Av., Botucatu, 18618-687, Brazil.
Regina P El DibEvidence-Based Medicine Unit, São Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, Brazil.
Drielle B S FigueiredoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University - UNESP, Professor Mário Rubens G. Montenegro Av., Botucatu, 18618-687, Brazil.
Leandro G BrazDepartment of Anesthesiology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University - UNESP, Professor Mário Rubens G. Montenegro Av., Botucatu, 18618-687, Brazil.
Mariana G BrazDepartment of Anesthesiology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University - UNESP, Professor Mário Rubens G. Montenegro Av., Botucatu, 18618-687, Brazil. mgbraz@hotmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4413-226X
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 129769/2016-9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Occupational exposure to inhalational anesthetics has been associated with health problems, including reproductive issues. Considering the scarcity and outdated nature of reviews concerning this relevant topic, which has implications for indoor pollution/environmental science/public health, this critical review aimed to systematically evaluate whether exposure to inhalational anesthetics is associated with abortion. Seven databases were searched with no language or year restrictions. Of the 3881 search results, 18 observational studies were included. Some studies demonstrated a significant association between occupational exposure to inhalational anesthetics and spontaneous abortion, especially among professionals who work for longer periods and/or in an environment without gas scavenging/ventilation systems, which may favor the occurrence of abortion in this population. Due to considerable heterogeneity and limitations, it cannot be concluded whether an association exists between occupational exposure to anesthetics and the occurrence of abortion. However, more well-designed studies should be performed, especially in less economically developed countries that do not have access to quality anesthetic gas scavenging/ventilation systems, thereby bringing this issue into sharp focus. This review highlights the need for scientific knowledge in this area and the extensive use of scavenging equipment and in the workplace to minimize exposure and reduce the risk of abortion.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousAnesthetics, InhalationOccupational ExposureAir ConditioningFemaleHumansPregnancyAnesthetics, InhalationHealth personnelIndoor air pollutionInhalation anestheticsOccupational exposureSpontaneous abortionWork environment

Identifiers

PMID33415631
OpenAlexW3119765202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.