SynthesisEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
Spontaneous abortion in women occupationally exposed to inhalational anesthetics: a critical systematic review.
Synthesis in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Occupational exposure to inhalational anesthetics and the risk of spontaneous abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Use of benefits during pregnancy: a cohort study in four organisations in Spain.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- Fertility and Pregnancy: How Do These Affect Family Planning and Surgeon Health?Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2023Review
- Occupational Exposure to Inhalational Anesthetics and Teratogenic Effects: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Non-Motherhood between Obligation and Choice: Statistical Analysis Based on Permutation Tests of Spontaneous and Induced Abortion Rates in the Italian Context.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Occupational exposure to inhalational anesthetics has been associated with health problems, including reproductive issues. Considering the scarcity and outdated nature of reviews concerning this relevant topic, which has implications for indoor pollution/environmental science/public health, this critical review aimed to systematically evaluate whether exposure to inhalational anesthetics is associated with abortion. Seven databases were searched with no language or year restrictions. Of the 3881 search results, 18 observational studies were included. Some studies demonstrated a significant association between occupational exposure to inhalational anesthetics and spontaneous abortion, especially among professionals who work for longer periods and/or in an environment without gas scavenging/ventilation systems, which may favor the occurrence of abortion in this population. Due to considerable heterogeneity and limitations, it cannot be concluded whether an association exists between occupational exposure to anesthetics and the occurrence of abortion. However, more well-designed studies should be performed, especially in less economically developed countries that do not have access to quality anesthetic gas scavenging/ventilation systems, thereby bringing this issue into sharp focus. This review highlights the need for scientific knowledge in this area and the extensive use of scavenging equipment and in the workplace to minimize exposure and reduce the risk of abortion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.