Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33415570›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2021

Distribution analysis of hydrogel spacer and evaluation of rectal dose reduction in Japanese prostate cancer patients undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Hiroaki Kobayashi, Takahisa Eriguchi, Tomoki Tanaka, Takeru Ogata, Masaru Ishida, Yosuke Nakajima, Atsuhiro Kumabe, Michio Kosugi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiroaki KobayashiDepartment of Urology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu hospital, 3-6-1, Shimosueyoshi, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama city, Kanagawa, 230-8765, Japan. shadow87jp@yahoo.co.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1038-8793
Takahisa EriguchiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu hospital, Yokohama city, Japan.
Tomoki TanakaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu hospital, Yokohama city, Japan.
Takeru OgataDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu hospital, Yokohama city, Japan.
Masaru IshidaDepartment of Urology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu hospital, 3-6-1, Shimosueyoshi, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama city, Kanagawa, 230-8765, Japan.
Yosuke NakajimaDepartment of Urology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu hospital, 3-6-1, Shimosueyoshi, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama city, Kanagawa, 230-8765, Japan.
Atsuhiro KumabeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu hospital, Yokohama city, Japan.
Michio KosugiDepartment of Urology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu hospital, 3-6-1, Shimosueyoshi, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama city, Kanagawa, 230-8765, Japan.
Saiseikai Yokohama Eastern Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo report on our primary experience with the placement of a hydrogel spacer following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients and assess its impact on dosimetry as well as acute toxicity.

methodsA total of 70 patients treated with SBRT (total dose of 36.25 Gy) in 5 fractions were included. Hydrogel spacers were inserted in 53 patients along with gold fiducial markers. For dosimetry, we trisected the rectum on the sagittal image of magnetic resonance imaging and defined it as the upper rectum (UR), middle rectum (MR), and lower rectum (LR). We compared the dose to each part of the rectum with and without hydrogel spacer using dose volume histograms. Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity assessments were conducted until 6 months of follow-up visits.

resultsThe median volume of the hydrogel spacer was 12.3 mL. Overall, the hydrogel spacer could significantly reduce the rectal dose in the middle-to-high-dose region (V20-V35). The rectum doses at the UR and MR were significantly lower in the spacer group in the middle to high dose region (V20-V35); the dose at the LR was significantly lower in the spacer group in the high-dose region (V30-V35). There was no grade ≥ 3 toxicity observed, but grade 2 toxicity of GU and GI occurred in 17.1% and 1.4% of the patients, respectively.

conclusionHydrogel spacers could contribute to rectal dose reduction, especially in high dose regions, by creating a prostate-rectum distance.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryDrug TaperingHumansHydrogelsJapanMaleOrgans at RiskRadiotherapy DosageRectumHydrogelsGenitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicitiesHydrogel spacerRectal dose reductionStereotactic body radiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID33415570
OpenAlexW3120575171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.