ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2021
Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome: Updates and Review of Current Therapy.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- CRISPR-Cas9 screen reveals that inhibition of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 sensitizes malignant T cells to dimethyl-fumarate-induced cell death.The FEBS journal · 2026Article
- Inducible Costimulator and Its Ligand Promote Proliferation and Migration of Tumor Cells in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Delayed Diagnosis of Sézary Syndrome: Lessons From a Psoriasiform Presentation.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Single-cell sequencing reveals the complexity of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- GATA3 as a Prognostic Marker in Early-Stage Classical Mycosis Fungoides: Association With Disease Progression and Survival Outcomes.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Effectiveness and safety of methotrexate in the treatment of mycosis fungoides: Real-world data from a multicentre study.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025Article
- Mental Health Diagnoses in Patients With Mycosis Fungoides and Potential Impact on Oncologic Outcomes.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Targeted dual biologic therapy for erythroderma of unknown etiology guided by high-parameter peripheral blood immunophenotyping.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Janus kinase inhibitors - a role for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas?Oncology reviews · 2025Review
- Application of urine proteomics in the diagnosis and treatment effectiveness monitoring of early-stage Mycosis Fungoides.Clinical proteomics · 2024Article
- 3D technique in superficial brachytherapy: New attitude in old field of mycosis fungoides.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2024Article
- Estimation of the tissue and serum levels of IL-35 in Mycosis fungoides: a case-control study.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Article
- A Narrative Review of the State of the Art of CCR4-Based Therapies in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas: Focus on Mogamulizumab and Future Treatments.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Severe insulin resistance in a patient with diabetes after treatment with brentuximab vedotin.BMJ case reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Bilateral peripheral ulcerative keratitis in a patient with known Sézary syndrome.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2024Article
- JAK Inhibitors in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma: Friend or Foe? A Systematic Review of the Published Literature.Cancers · 2024Review
- Clinical and Real-World Effectiveness of Mogamulizumab: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Transcriptomic and proteomic analysis of tumor suppressive effects of GZ17-6.02 against mycosis fungoides.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementWhile most patients with early-stage mycosis fungoides (MF) follow an indolent course, patients with advanced-stage MF/Sézary syndrome (SS) have a poor prognosis with a median survival of less than 5 years. Although there are a number of treatments currently available, achieving and maintaining a durable response remain challenging, especially in advanced-stage MF/SS. The choice of frontline therapy is dependent on the stage of disease. For early-stage MF, the treatment concept is to control skin lesions mainly by skin-directed therapies, such as topical therapies, phototherapies, and radiotherapies. For advanced-stage MF/SS, systemic treatments by biological or targeted therapies including bexarotene and interferon either alone or in combination are tried first, with more immunosuppressive chemotherapies being reserved for refractory or rapidly progressive disease. Recent improvements in biological or targeted therapies include brentuximab vedotin and mogamulizumab. When biopsy samples have 10% or more CD30-positive malignant cells, brentuximab vedotin, an anti-CD30 antibody conjugated to monomethyl auristin E, can be a desirable treatment option. For cases with blood involvement, mogamulizumab, an antibody binding to C-C chemokine receptor 4, is effective with high response rates. In the refractory setting, alemtuzumab, histone deacetylase inhibitors, pralatrexate, gemcitabine, and doxorubicin are considered as the treatment option. Because only allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation can offer a chance of cure with durable complete remission, advanced-stage patients with a markedly short life expectancy should be evaluated for eligibility. Given that there are few randomized controlled studies in the literature, it is necessary to investigate which therapy is preferable for each patient with MF/SS by comparative prospective trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.