Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33415310›Full record

ReviewAPL bioengineering2020

Microrheology for biomaterial design.

Katherine Joyner, Sydney Yang, Gregg A Duncan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in APL bioengineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Synthetic mucus biomaterials synergize with antibiofilm agents to combatbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Synthetic mucus biomaterials for antimicrobial peptide delivery.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2023
    Article
  17. Synthetic Mucus Biomaterials for Antimicrobial Peptide Delivery.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katherine JoynerFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8290-000X
Sydney YangFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5561-3152

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microrheology analyzes the microscopic behavior of complex materials by measuring the diffusion and transport of embedded particle probes. This experimental method can provide valuable insight into the design of biomaterials with the ability to connect material properties and biological responses to polymer-scale dynamics and interactions. In this review, we discuss how microrheology can be harnessed as a characterization method complementary to standard techniques in biomaterial design. We begin by introducing the core principles and instruments used to perform microrheology. We then review previous studies that incorporate microrheology in their design process and highlight biomedical applications that have been supported by this approach. Overall, this review provides rationale and practical guidance for the utilization of microrheological analysis to engineer novel biomaterials.

Identifiers

PMID33415310
PMCPMC7775114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.