Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33415305›Full record

ArticleSAGE open nursing

Relationship Between Tracheal Suctioning Catheter Motion and Secretion Amount Based on Viscosity.

Noriyo Colley, Shunsuke Komizunai, Atsushi Konno, Satoshi Kanai, Shinji Ninomiya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Noriyo ColleyFaculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4811-3499
Shunsuke KomizunaiFaculty of Information Science and Technology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Atsushi KonnoFaculty of Information Science and Technology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Satoshi KanaiFaculty of Information Science and Technology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Shinji NinomiyaDepartment of Clinical Engineering, Hiroshima International University, Hiroshima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo provide safe tracheal suctioning, the American Association of Respiratory Care guideline discusses the length of suctioning catheter, but the most effective tracheal suctioning catheter technique is still unknown.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to compare the amount of simulated secretion produced by five different handlings of a catheter at two different viscosities and in two different models to discover the most effective suctioning maneuver in the various mucus conditions.

designIn vitro experimental design.

methodsThe amount of secretion aspirated by our researcher's manipulation of a suctioning catheter was measured. The tip of the catheter was recorded using a high-speed video camera to visualize the secretion motion.

resultsThe most effective suctioning technique differed depending on the viscosity of the secretion. There were no significant differences between five suctioning methods applied to high-viscosity phlegm in a tracheal membrane model, but the flexion technique was the most efficient for low-viscosity secretion.

conclusionsOur results imply that the flexion technique was reasonably safe and the most effective of these five methods for low-viscosity secretion.

Indexed as

artificial trachea modelhigh-speed cameranon-Newtonian fluidriskssetting pressure

Identifiers

PMID33415305
PMCPMC7774403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.