Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33415209›Full record

ArticleSAGE open nursing

Nurses' Perception of a Tailored Web-Based Intervention for the Self-Management of Pain After Cardiac Surgery.

Geraldine Martorella, Lucinda Graven, Glenna Schluck, Mélanie Bérubé, Céline Gélinas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A qualitative study of orthodontic patients' experiences in quarantine during the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak.American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Barriers and Facilitators to the Prevention of Chronic Pain in the Subacute Phase After Cardiac Surgery.Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Geraldine MartorellaTMH Center for Research and Evidence-Based Practice, College of Nursing, Florida State University, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9383-7114
Lucinda GravenCollege of Nursing, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Glenna SchluckCollege of Nursing, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Mélanie BérubéIngram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Céline GélinasIngram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Florida State University · USJewish General Hospital · CAMcGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac surgeries rank among the most frequent surgical procedures and present a risk of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP). A continuum approach is required to prevent the development of CPSP. As a first step, a tailored web-based intervention was developed and successfully tested to tackle pain management during hospitalization. Before proceeding to further development, preliminary acceptability of the intervention including the postdischarge phase must be evaluated. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine nurses' perception of a tailored Web-based intervention for pain management in the early recovery phase. The objectives were to evaluate intervention's acceptability and to identify ways to enhance its acceptability.

methodsA parallel mixed methods approach was used to assess the acceptability of the intervention in the early recovery phase (first month after surgery).

resultsIn total, 249 participants completed the online survey and 10 participants were individually interviewed. Overall, the intervention was rated as acceptable. No difference was found in acceptability ratings by demographics. The intervention was rated as appropriate to very much appropriate by 79% of participants. Although nurses seemingly would recommend it to their patients, they did not perceive that their patients would be as highly willing to use it. Interviews highlighted several strengths of the intervention, such as postoperative pain awareness, customization of content, and flexible dosage and schedule. However, the main weakness was related to patient adherence. Opting for a hybrid format and integrating individual preferences could enhance the coaching experience.

conclusionThe innovative intervention was judged as acceptable for pain management in the early recovery phase. Considering that the intervention has demonstrated positive effects on the pain experience in the first week after cardiac surgery, it seems logical to explore its potential impact after discharge on the transition to CPSP.

Indexed as

cardiologyhealth promotionmedical/surgicalpracticetelenursing

Identifiers

PMID33415209
PMCPMC7774353
OpenAlexW2900863996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.