ReviewFrontiers in oncology2020
Hematopoeitic Cell Transplantation and CAR T-Cell Therapy: Complements or Competitors?
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A phase 1 trial of CD123-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in adults with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia or blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Article
- Single cell RNA sequencing improves the next generation of approaches to AML treatment: challenges and perspectives.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Review
- Inhibitory CARs fail to protect from immediate T cell cytotoxicity.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024Article
- Optimizing cancer treatment: the synergistic potential of CAR-T cell therapy and CRISPR/Cas9.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Impact of prior therapies and subsequent transplantation on outcomes in adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with brexucabtagene autoleucel in ZUMA-3.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2023Article
- Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells: Novel cell therapy for hematological malignancies.Cancer medicine · 2023Review
- Do CAR-T and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Both Have a Place in Lymphoid Neoplasms?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- CAR-T cell combination therapy: the next revolution in cancer treatment.Cancer cell international · 2022Review
- Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy versus Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: An Evolving Perspective.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2022Review
- Article
- The Road to CAR T-Cell Therapies for Pediatric CNS Tumors: Obstacles and New Avenues.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR T) therapy are the main modalities of adoptive cellular immunotherapy that have widely permeated the clinical space. The advent of both technologies revolutionized treatment of many hematologic malignancies, both offering the chance at sustained remissions for patients who would otherwise invariably succumb to their diseases. The understanding and exploitation of the nonspecific alloreactivity of allo-HCT and the graft-versus-tumor effect is contrasted by the genetically engineered precision of CAR T therapy. Historically, those with relapsed and refractory hematologic malignancies have often been considered for allo-HCT, although outcomes vary dramatically and are associated with potential acute and chronic toxicities. Such patients, mainly with B-lymphoid malignancies, may now be offered CAR T therapy. Yet, a lack of prospective data to guide decisions thereafter requires individualized approaches on whether to proceed to allo-HCT or observe. The continued innovations to make CAR T therapy more effective and accessible will continue to alter such approaches, but similar innovations in allo-HCT will likely result in similarly improved clinical outcomes. In this review, we describe the history of the two platforms, dissect the clinical indications emphasizing their intertwining and competitive roles described in trials and practice guidelines, and highlight innovations in which they complement or inform one another.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.