Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33415032›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

Correlation of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) with Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Khurram Butt, Jason D'Souza, Cai Yuan, Jayapriya Jayakumaran, Michelle Nguyen, Hamza I Butt, Khalid Abusaada

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Khurram ButtInternal Medicine, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, USA.
Jason D'SouzaCardiology, St. Luke's Health System, University of Missouri, Kansas City, USA.
Cai YuanOncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Jayapriya JayakumaranInternal Medicine, Ocala Regional Medical Center, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, USA.
Michelle NguyenInternal Medicine, Ocala Regional Medical Center, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Ocala, USA.
Hamza I ButtEpidemiology and Public Health, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.
Khalid AbusaadaInternal Medicine, Ocala Regional Medical Center, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Ocala, USA.
College of Central Florida · USRegional Medical Center · USUniversity of Arizona · USOrlando Regional Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Contrast-induced acute nephropathy (CIN) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the setting of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is associated with adverse outcomes, including longer hospitalization and short and long-term mortality. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are inflammatory markers that have been validated separately in prior studies as a predictor of CIN in patients with ACS who undergo a left heart catheterization. Our study aims to further investigate the role of NLR and PLR together as markers for predicting CIN in patients with ACS.  Methods A retrospective chart review was performed on a total of 1,577 patients aged 18 - 90 who presented with ACS and underwent PCI between January 2011 to December 2015 at the Florida Hospital Orlando. Cut-off values used for a high PLR and NLR were PLR > 128 and NLR > 2.6. CIN was defined as an increased serum creatinine level by ≥ 0.5 mg/dL, or ≥ 25%, over the baseline value within 72 hours after contrast agent administration. Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) were excluded.  Results Of the 1,577 patients included in the study, 213 (13.51%) patients had CIN. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, high NLR showed an independent association with an elevated risk of CIN (OR 2.03, 95% CI: 1.403 - 3.176, P < 0.001). High PLR did not correlate with CIN (OR 0.831, 95% CI: 0.569 - 1.214, P = 0.339).  Conclusion Elevated NLR is an independent predictor of CIN in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and may be used to improve on current risk prediction models.

Indexed as

acute kidney injury (aki)acute myocardial infarction (ami)cardiac catheterizationcontrast-induced nephropathy (cin)coronary artery disease (cad)nephropathyneutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (nlr)percutaneous coronary intervention (pci)platelet to lymphocyte ratio (plr)

Identifiers

PMID33415032
PMCPMC7781777
OpenAlexW3108641908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.