Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33415028›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

Medical Simulation-Based Learning Outcomes in Pre-Clinical Medical Education.

Maxwell J Jabaay, Dario A Marotta, Stephen L Aita, Dianne B Walker, Leah O Grcevich, Victor Camba, James R Nolin, James Lyons, John Giannini

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06645288 (The Use of an Emergency Reflex Action Drill in Emergency Surgical Airway), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06645288 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Use of an Emergency Reflex Action Drill in Emergency Surgical Airway

TypeobservationalSponsorErasmus Medical CenterRan2024 to 2026Enrolled84ConditionsEmergency Medical Services, Airway Management, Cricothyroidotomy, PrehospitalArmsEmergency Reflex Action Drill
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maxwell J JabaayDepartment of Research, Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine, Dothan, USA.
Dario A MarottaDepartment of Research, Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine, Dothan, USA.
Stephen L AitaDepartment of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, USA.
Dianne B WalkerDepartment of Simulation, Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine, Dothan, USA.
Leah O GrcevichDepartment of Research, Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine, Dothan, USA.
Victor CambaDepartment of Research, Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine, Dothan, USA.
James R NolinDepartment of Simulation, Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine, Dothan, USA.
James LyonsDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine, Dothan, USA.
John GianniniDepartment of Simulation, Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine, Dothan, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Medical simulation is widely used in the United States medical curriculum. However, learning outcomes based on simulation have yet to be reported. In this study, we aim to characterize the objective performance of first- and second-year medical students following eight weeks of medical simulation-based learning. Methods First- (n=25) and second-year (n=15) medical students were recruited for this study. We designed and administered a novel pre-experience examination to collect participant demography and assess simulation and non-simulation knowledge. Following 14 high-fidelity simulation scenarios over the course of eight weeks, we administered an identical post-experience examination and compared performance, primarily using a within-subjects analytic design. Results Student performance improved by an average of 18% following the medical simulation experience, and first-year students demonstrated greater benefit (22%) as compared to second-years (12%). Relative to first-years, second-year students showed higher overall performance on both pre- and post-examination. Demographic factors and prior medical experience were not significantly associated with assessment performance and score improvement. Conclusions Our data supported the efficacy of simulation-based learning as evidenced by the significant improvement in objective performance on a standardized examination. That is, both first- and second-year medical students demonstrated test-score improvement following an eight-week medical simulation program. Of note, the first-year students exhibited greater benefit (at the group level). Importantly, these findings were statistically unrelated to participant demographic and background variables. Collectively, this study provides preliminary evidence that medical simulation in the pre-clinical phase of undergraduate medical education is an effective tool for student learning.

Indexed as

clinicalcomlexemergency medicinemedical educationpre-clinicalundergraduateusmle

Identifiers

PMID33415028
PMCPMC7781771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.