Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33415023›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2020

Classify multicategory outcome in patients with lung adenocarcinoma using clinical, transcriptomic and clinico-transcriptomic data: machine learning versus multinomial models.

Fei Deng, Lanlan Shen, He Wang, Lanjing Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fei DengSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Shanghai Institute of Technology Shanghai, China.
Lanlan ShenDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, USDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center Houston, TX, USA.
He WangDepartment of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine New Haven, CT, USA.
Lanjing ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Princeton Medical Center Plainsboro, NJ, USA.
Children's Nutrition Research Center at Baylor College of Medicine · USShanghai Institute of Technology · CNUniversity Medical Center of Princeton · USYale University · US

Funding

Epigenetically Engineered Mouse Model for Lung Cancer TherapyR01CA261723 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SHEN, LANLAN · 2021 to 2025
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA261723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classification of multicategory survival-outcome is important for precision oncology. Machine learning (ML) algorithms have been used to accurately classify multi-category survival-outcome of some cancer-types, but not yet that of lung adenocarcinoma. Therefore, we compared the performances of 3 ML models (random forests, support vector machine [SVM], multilayer perceptron) and multinomial logistic regression (Mlogit) models for classifying 4-category survival-outcome of lung adenocarcinoma using the TCGA. Mlogit model overall performed similar to SVM and multilayer perceptron models (micro-average area under curve=0.82), while random forests model was inferior. Surprisingly, transcriptomic data alone and clinico-transcriptomic data appeared sufficient to accurately classify the 4-category survival-outcome in these patients, but no models using clinical data alone performed well. Notably,

Indexed as

cause-specific mortalityLung adenocarcinomamachine learningmultilabel classificationsurvivaltranscriptomic

Identifiers

PMID33415023
PMCPMC7783755
OpenAlexW3119723890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.