Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33414993›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of cancer research2020

Imaging-guided brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: the main process and common techniques.

Zhongshan Liu, Yangzhi Zhao, Yunfeng Li, Jing Sun, Xia Lin, Tiejun Wang, Jie Guo

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Applicator for cervical brachytherapy for MRI or CT guided therapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhongshan LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University Changchun 130041, China.
Yangzhi ZhaoDepartment of Hematology, The First Hospital of Jilin University Changchun 130021, China.
Yunfeng LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University Changchun 130041, China.
Jing SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University Changchun 130041, China.
Xia LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University Changchun 130041, China.
Tiejun WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University Changchun 130041, China.
Jie GuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University Changchun 130041, China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University · CNJilin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brachytherapy (BT) delivers integrated boost doses to the central tumor while sparing the surrounding organs at risk (OARs) efficiently. It's a mandatory treatment component for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) because it results in excellent overall survival and local control compared with other dose boosting modalities. Currently, BT is undergoing a transition from 2-dimensional (2D) to 3-dimensional (3D) treatment planning. Imaging-guided BT (IGBT) employing computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can provide exact individual delineation of target and OARs meanwhile prescribe the dose to the target volume instead of "point A" for X-ray-based BT. There are three main techniques for BT: intracavitary (IC), interstitial (IS), and intracavitary/interstitial (IC/IS) combination. The applicator choice depends on the specific tumor extension. The real-time transabdominal ultrasound (US)-guided applicator placement technique is strongly recommended to ensure ideal applicator positioning. MRI is the ideal standard imaging for BT owing to its superior soft tissue visualization than CT. However, CT-based BT is more often performed because of the availability. In developing countries, US-based BT can be adopted. For treatment planning, the applicator reconstruction is easier on CT than on MRI, because the applicator image is more clearly visible. Individual treatment planning should be performed for every single applicator insertion to ensure dose accuracy. In this review article, we explain the main clinical process and common techniques, including the applicator choice and placement, imaging techniques, target delineation, and treatment planning; asthose will help to improve the efficiency of 3D BT.

Indexed as

brachytherapycervical cancerImaging-guidedprocesstechnique

Identifiers

PMID33414993
PMCPMC7783772
OpenAlexW3119031980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.