Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33414876›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of exercise science2020

The Impact of Formal Strength and Conditioning on the Fitness of Law Enforcement Recruits: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Robert G Lockie, J Jay Dawes, Nicholas D Maclean, Rodney P Pope, Ryan J Holmes, Charlie L Kornhauser, Robin M Orr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of exercise science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Robert G LockieCenter for Sport Performance, Department of Kinesiology, California State University-Fullerton, Fullerton, CA, USA.
J Jay DawesSchool of Kinesiology, Applied Health, and Recreation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Nicholas D MacleanFaculty of Health Science and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD, AUSTRALIA.
Rodney P PopeSchool of Community Health, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW, AUSTRALIA.
Ryan J HolmesColarado State Highway Patrol, CO, USA.
Charlie L KornhauserColarado State Highway Patrol, CO, USA.
Robin M OrrTactical Research Unit, Bond University, Robina, QLD, AUSTRALIA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research involving law enforcement populations has suggested better fitness could enhance job task performance and reduce injuries. Academy training should lead to improvements in recruit fitness. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of a strength and conditioning program on fitness among law enforcement recruits. Twenty-six recruits (23 males, three females) completed a 27-week academy, which incorporated 3-4 physical training sessions per week. Fitness assessment occurred during pre- (week 0), mid- (week 14), and post-testing (week 27) time points. The fitness assessments included: vertical jump, one-minute push-ups, one-minute sit-ups, posterior chain strength measured by a leg/back dynamometer, grip strength, and aerobic fitness measured by the 20-m multistage shuttle run (MSR). A repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc tests determined any significant changes in fitness between time points, with alpha set at

Indexed as

Cadetphysical trainingtactical

Identifiers

PMID33414876
PMCPMC7745894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.