Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33414851›Full record

ArticleFottea (Praha)2019

Evaluating High-Throughput Sequencing Data of Microalgae Living in Melting Snow: Improvements and Limitations

Stefanie Lutz, Lenka Procházková, Liane G Benning, Linda Nedbalová, Daniel Remias

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fottea (Praha), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Distribution and biogeography ofEcology and evolution · 2020
    Article
  12. Snow and Glacial Algae: A ReviewJournal of phycology · 2020
    Review
  13. Cysts of the Snow AlgaFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stefanie Lutz *Agroscope, Schloss 1, 8820 Wädenswil, Switzerland (current address) GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany.
Lenka Procházková *Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 7, 128 44 Prague 2, Czech Republic.
Liane G BenningGFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany School of Earth & Environment, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK Department of Earth Sciences, Free University of Berlin, 12249 Berlin, Germany.
Linda NedbalováDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 7, 128 44 Prague 2, Czech Republic.
Daniel RemiasUniversity of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Stelzhamerstraße 23, 4600 Wels, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 29959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melting snow fields are an extremophilic habitat dominated by closely related Chlamydomonadaceae (Chlorophyta). Microscopy-based classification of these cryophilic microalgae is challenging and may not reveal the true diversity. High-throughput sequencing (HTS) allows for a more comprehensive evaluation of the community. However, HTS approaches have been rarely used in such ecosystems and the output of their application has not been evaluated. Furthermore, there is no consensus on the choice for a suitable DNA marker or data processing workflow. We found that the correct placement of taxonomic strings onto OTUs strongly depends on the quality of the reference databases. We improved the assignments of the HST data by generating additional reference sequences of the locally abundant taxa, guided by light microscopy. Furthermore, a manual inspection of all automated OTU assignments, oligotyping of the most abundant 18S OTUs, as well as ITS2 secondary structure analyses were necessary for accurate species assignments. Moreover, the sole use of one marker can cause misleading results, either because of insufficient variability within the locus (18S) or the scarcity of reference sequences (ITS2). Our evaluation reveals that HTS output needs to be thoroughly checked when the studied habitats or organisms are poorly represented in publicly available databases. We recommend an optimized workflow for an improved biodiversity evaluation of not only snow algal communities, but generally 'exotic' ecosystems where similar problems arise. A consistent sampling strategy, two- molecular marker approach, light microscopy-based guidance, generation of appropriate reference sequences and final manual verification of all taxonomic assignments are highly recommended.

Indexed as

18S rDNAhigh-throughput sequencingIlluminaITS2 rDNAoligotypingOTU clusteringred snowSangersecondary structuresnow algae

Identifiers

PMID33414851
PMCPMC7116558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.