ArticleJournal of blood medicine2020
Intermittent versus Daily Eltrombopag Dosage Protocols for the Treatment of Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia: Real-Life Experience.
Article in Journal of blood medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
aimEltrombopag is recommended for the treatment of refractory immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Based on its half-life, it may be practical to use an intermittent dosage. Our aim was to compare the effectiveness and safety of intermittent vs daily eltrombopag dosage protocols for the treatment of primary ITP refractory to prior therapies. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis was a retrospective study, and 34 adult primary ITP patients refractory to prior therapies were included in our analysis. Eltrombopag was used in this study. The patients were divided into daily eltrombopag dosage and intermittent eltrombopag dosage groups. Eltrombopag effectiveness was assessed regarding platelet count and bleeding resolution. Safety was assessed via adverse events reporting.
resultsIn the daily eltrombopag dosage group, overall response (OR), complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and relapse rates were 69.23%, 53.85%, 15.38%, and 30.77%, respectively. In the intermittent eltrombopag dosage group, OR, CR, PR, and relapse rates were 68.75%, 50%, 18.75%, and 31.25%, respectively. Comparison between daily and intermittent eltrombopag dosage groups as regards CR, PR, relapse, relapse-free survival and adverse events showed insignificant differences.
conclusionIntermittent eltrombopag dosage is safe and effective in patients with ITP refractory to prior therapies and comparable to the daily eltrombopag dosage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.