ReviewNature chemical biology2021
Harnessing nanotechnology to expand the toolbox of chemical biology.
Review in Nature chemical biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanomedicine-Enabled/Augmented Cell Autophagy to Mitigate and Boycott the Development and Progression of Atherosclerotic Plaque.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Biohybrid materials comprising an artificial peroxidase and differently shaped gold nanoparticles.Nanoscale advances · 2024Article
- Review
- Nanomedicine for Diagnosis and Treatment of Atherosclerosis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Nanosensor-based monitoring of autophagy-associated lysosomal acidification in vivo.Nature chemical biology · 2023Article
- Advances of medical nanorobots for future cancer treatments.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2023Review
- Reverse-QTY code design of active human serum albumin self-assembled amphiphilic nanoparticles for effective anti-tumor drug doxorubicin release in mice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Utilization of Functionalized Metal-Organic Framework Nanoparticle as Targeted Drug Delivery System for Cancer Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Environmental dimensions of the protein corona.Nature nanotechnology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although nanotechnology often addresses biomedical needs, nanoscale tools can also facilitate broad biological discovery. Nanoscale delivery, imaging, biosensing, and bioreactor technologies may address unmet questions at the interface between chemistry and biology. Currently, many chemical biologists do not include nanomaterials in their toolbox, and few investigators develop nanomaterials in the context of chemical tools to answer biological questions. We reason that the two fields are ripe with opportunity for greater synergy. Nanotechnologies can expand the utility of chemical tools in the hands of chemical biologists, for example, through controlled delivery of reactive and/or toxic compounds or signal-binding events of small molecules in living systems. Conversely, chemical biologists can work with nanotechnologists to address challenging biological questions that are inaccessible to both communities. This Perspective aims to introduce the chemical biology community to nanotechnologies that may expand their methodologies while inspiring nanotechnologists to address questions relevant to chemical biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.