Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33414540›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2021

Prognostic value of desmoplastic reaction characterisation in stage II colon cancer: prospective validation in a Phase 3 study (SACURA Trial).

Hideki Ueno, Megumi Ishiguro, Eiji Nakatani, Toshiaki Ishikawa, Hiroyuki Uetake, Kenta Murotani, Shigeyuki Matsui, Satoshi Teramukai, Tamotsu Sugai, Yoichi Ajioka and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

Hideki UenoDepartment of Surgery, National Defense Medical College, 3-2 Namiki, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan. ueno_surg1@ndmc.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8600-1199
Megumi IshiguroDepartment of Translational Oncology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Eiji NakataniDivision of Statistical Analysis of Research Support Center, Shizuoka General Hospital, 4-27-1, Kitaando, Aoi-ku, Shizuoka, Japan.
Toshiaki IshikawaDepartment of Specialized Surgeries, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki UetakeDepartment of Specialized Surgeries, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7162-6842
Kenta MurotaniBiostatistics Center, Kurume University, 67 Asahi-Machi, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.
Shigeyuki MatsuiDepartment of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Satoshi TeramukaiDepartment of Biostatistics, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajii-cho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.
Tamotsu SugaiDepartment of Molecular Diagnostic Pathology, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1, Shiwagun, Yahabachou, Iwate, Japan.
Yoichi AjiokaDivision of Molecular and Diagnostic Pathology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata, Japan.
Hirotoshi MaruoDepartment of Surgery, Shizuoka City Shimizu Hospital, 1231 Miyakami, Shimizu-ku, Shizuoka, Japan.
Masahito KotakaGastrointestinal Cancer Center, Sano Hospital, 2-5-1 Shimizugaoka, Tarumi-ku Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Masaki TsujieDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Prefectural Saiseikai Tondabayashi Hospital, 1-3-36 Koyodai, Tondabayashi, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshinori MunemotoDepartment of Surgery, Fukui-ken Saiseikai Hospital, 7-1 Funabashi, Wadanaka-cho, Fukui, Japan.
Takashi YamaguchiSurgery Division, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, 1-1 Fukakusa-Mukaihata-cho, Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, Japan.
Hisashi KurodaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, 422 Tsubuku-honmachi, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.
Mutsumi FukunagaDepartment of Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-cho, Nishi-ku, Sakai City, Osaka, Japan.
Naohiro TomitaDivision of Lower GI Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1 Mukogawa-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.
Kenichi SugiharaTokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Tokyo Medical and Dental University · JPFukui-ken Saiseikai Hospital · JPHyogo Medical University · JPIwate Medical University · JPKurume University · JPKyoto Medical Center · JPKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPNagoya University · JPNational Defense Medical College · JPNiigata University Medical and Dental Hospital · JPSakai Municipal Hospital · JPShimizu (Japan) · JPShizuoka City Shimizu Hospital · JPShizuoka General Hospital · JPSt Mary's Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe characterisation of desmoplastic reaction (DR) has emerged as a new, independent prognostic determinant in colorectal cancer. Herein, we report the validation of its prognostic value in a randomised controlled study (SACURA trial).

methodsThe study included 991 stage II colon cancer patients. DR was classified by the central review as Mature, Intermediate or Immature based on the presence of hyalinised collagen bundles and myxoid stroma at the desmoplastic front. All clinical and pathological data, including DR characterisations, were prospectively recorded and analysed 5 years after the completion of the registration.

resultsThe five-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was the highest in the Mature group (N = 638), followed by the Intermediate (N = 294) and Immature groups (N = 59). Multivariate analysis revealed that DR classification was an independent prognostic factor, and based on Harrell's C-index, the Cox model for predicting RFS was significantly improved by including DR. In the conditional inference tree analysis, DR categorisation was the first split factor for predicting RFS, followed by T-stage, microsatellite instability status and budding.

conclusionsHistological categorisation of DR provides important prognostic information that could contribute to the efficient selection of stage II colon cancer patients who would benefit from postoperative adjuvant therapy.

Indexed as

AgedColonic NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisProspective StudiesStromal CellsSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID33414540
PMCPMC7960987
OpenAlexW3118937338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.