Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33414527›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2021

Safety and efficacy of repeated crosslinking assisted by transepithelial double-cycle iontophoresis in keratoconus progression after primary corneal crosslinking.

Huping Wu, Lan Li, Shunrong Luo, Xie Fang, Xumin Shang, Zhiwen Xie, Xianwen Xiao, Huan He, Zhirong Lin, Zuguo Liu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Transepithelial corneal cross-linking: a review.International ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Paediatric cornea crosslinking current strategies: A review.Advances in ophthalmology practice and research
    Review
  12. Scratch beneath the surface.Oman journal of ophthalmology
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Huping WuEye Institute and Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center of Xiamen University, Fujian, Xiamen, China.
Lan LiEye Institute and Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center of Xiamen University, Fujian, Xiamen, China.
Shunrong LuoEye Institute and Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center of Xiamen University, Fujian, Xiamen, China.
Xie FangEye Institute and Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center of Xiamen University, Fujian, Xiamen, China.
Xumin ShangEye Institute and Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center of Xiamen University, Fujian, Xiamen, China.
Zhiwen XieEye Institute and Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center of Xiamen University, Fujian, Xiamen, China.
Xianwen XiaoEye Institute and Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center of Xiamen University, Fujian, Xiamen, China.
Huan HeEye Institute and Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center of Xiamen University, Fujian, Xiamen, China.
Zhirong LinEye Institute and Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center of Xiamen University, Fujian, Xiamen, China. charlie.lyn668@foxmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8201-4902
Zuguo LiuEye Institute and Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center of Xiamen University, Fujian, Xiamen, China. zuguoliu@xmu.edu.cn.
Xiamen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of repeated corneal collagen crosslinking assisted by transepithelial double-cycle iontophoresis (DI-CXL) in the management of keratoconus progression after primary CXL.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted in the patients who underwent repeated CXL between 2016 and 2018. These patients were treated with DI-CXL if keratoconus progression was confirmed after primary CXL. Scoring of ocular pain and corneal epithelial damage, visual acuity, corneal tomography, in vivo corneal confocal microscopy (IVCM) was performed before and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after DI-CXL.

resultsOverall, 21 eyes of 12 patients (mean age 17.3 ± 1.9 years) were included in this study. Before DI-CXL, an average increase of 4.26 D in K

conclusionDI-CXL is safe and effective as a good alternative in stabilizing keratoconus progression after primary CXL.

Indexed as

KeratoconusAdolescentAdultCollagenCross-Linking ReagentsHumansIontophoresisPhotosensitizing AgentsRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultCollagenCross-Linking ReagentsPhotosensitizing Agents

Identifiers

PMID33414527
PMCPMC8526808
OpenAlexW3120329111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.