ArticleJournal of human hypertension2021
Blood pressure variability in patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of pulse pressure variability evaluated by visit-to-visit on heart failure events in patients with hypertension: insights from the SPRINT trial.European journal of medical research · 2024Trial
- Empagliflozin Improves Angina and Endothelial Dysfunction Indices in Angina and No Obstructive Coronary Arteries (ANOCA).Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2026Article
- Blood Pressure Variability (BPV): What Clinicians Need to Know a 2025 Expert Consensus Report Endorsed by the Egyptian Society of Cardiology.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2025Article
- Temporal and Bidirectional Association Between Blood Pressure Variability and Arterial Stiffness: Cross-Lagged Cohort Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a real challenge in the management of ischemia with non-obstructive coronary artery disease. So, we need to study the mechanisms of persistent angina and non-obstructive coronary artery (ANOCA) patients. One of those possible mechanisms is blood pressure variability (BPV). We aimed to study the relation between BPV and angina in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease. Our study included 150 patients with chest pain and positive non-invasive stress test suggestive of myocardial ischemia and normal coronary angiography or non-obstructive coronary artery disease. We used an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring device. We found a positive correlation between BPV as measured by average real variability (ARV) as well as standard deviation (SD) parameters and the severity of anginal symptoms with P values for all parameters was 0.001 except day systolic SD P-value was 0.021. We performed a regression analysis for all statistically significant parameters. We found that 24H diastolic ARV, day diastolic ARV, night diastolic ARV, 24H diastolic SD, day diastolic SD, and night diastolic SD were independent predictors of the severity of angina with P-values (0.015, 0.007, 0.011, 0.037, 0.014, and 0.029), respectively. We concluded that short-term BPV represented by ARV and SD had a consistent association with angina in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease. The diastolic parameters of ARV and SD were independent predictors of the severity of angina with non-obstructive coronary artery disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.