Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33414240›Full record

ReviewThorax2021

Breathomics for the clinician: the use of volatile organic compounds in respiratory diseases.

Wadah Ibrahim, Liesl Carr, Rebecca Cordell, Michael J Wilde, Dahlia Salman, Paul S Monks, Paul Thomas, Chris E Brightling, Salman Siddiqui, Neil J Greening

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Thorax, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. [Breath metabolomic characteristics of schizophrenia and their potential for auxiliary diagnosis].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wadah IbrahimDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Liesl CarrInstitute for Lung Health, Leicester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK.
Rebecca CordellSchool of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Michael J WildeSchool of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Dahlia SalmanDepartment of Chemistry, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
Paul S MonksSchool of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Paul ThomasDepartment of Chemistry, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
Chris E BrightlingDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5803-5121
Salman SiddiquiDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Neil J GreeningDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK neil.greening@leicester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0453-7529
University of Leicester · GBLoughborough University · GBNIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre · GB

Funding

Department of Health PDF-2017-10-052Medical Research Council MR/N005880/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exhaled breath analysis has the potential to provide valuable insight on the status of various metabolic pathways taking place in the lungs locally and other vital organs, via systemic circulation. For years, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have been proposed as feasible alternative diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for different respiratory pathologies.We reviewed the currently published literature on the discovery of exhaled breath VOCs and their utilisation in various respiratory diseasesKey barriers in the development of clinical breath tests include the lack of unified consensus for breath collection and analysis and the complexity of understanding the relationship between the exhaled VOCs and the underlying metabolic pathways. We present a comprehensive overview, in light of published literature and our experience from coordinating a national breathomics centre, of the progress made to date and some of the key challenges in the field and ways to overcome them. We particularly focus on the relevance of breathomics to clinicians and the valuable insights it adds to diagnostics and disease monitoring.Breathomics holds great promise and our findings merit further large-scale multicentre diagnostic studies using standardised protocols to help position this novel technology at the centre of respiratory disease diagnostics.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBreath TestsExhalationHumansLungRespiration DisordersVolatile Organic CompoundsBiomarkersVolatile Organic Compoundsexhaled airway markersrespiratory infection

Identifiers

PMID33414240
PMCPMC7611078
OpenAlexW3118534440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.