ReviewScience (New York, N.Y.)2021
Making sense of neural development by comparing wiring strategies for seeing and hearing.
Review in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inverse expression of Ten3 and Lphn2 across the developing mouse brain suggests a global strategy for circuit assembly.Current biology : CB · 2026Article
- Comprehensive analysis of aberrant alternative splicing and RNA binding proteins associated with age-related sensorineural hearing loss.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Chromatin remodeling protein CHD4 regulates axon guidance of spiral ganglion neurons in the developing cochlea.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Identification of Risk Loci for Radiotherapy-Induced Tinnitus and Hearing Loss Through Integrated Genomic Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- The single-cell transcriptomic landscape of the topological differences in mammalian auditory receptors.Science China. Life sciences · 2024Article
- Ambient sound stimulation tunes axonal conduction velocity by regulating radial growth of myelin on an individual, axon-by-axon basis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Synaptic promiscuity in brain development.Current biology : CB · 2024Review
- Comparative expression analysis of the Atoh7 gene regulatory network in the mouse and chicken auditory hindbrain.Cell and tissue research · 2023Article
- Generation of human otic neuronal organoids using pluripotent stem cells.Cell proliferation · 2023Article
- Developmental spontaneous activity promotes formation of sensory domains, frequency tuning and proper gain in central auditory circuits.Cell reports · 2022Article
- Sleep, plasticity, and sensory neurodevelopment.Neuron · 2022Review
- The primary visual cortex of Cetartiodactyls: organization, cytoarchitectonics and comparison with perissodactyls and primates.Brain structure & function · 2022Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability to perceive and interact with the world depends on a diverse array of neural circuits specialized for carrying out specific computations. Each circuit is assembled using a relatively limited number of molecules and common developmental steps, from cell fate specification to activity-dependent synaptic refinement. Given this shared toolkit, how do individual circuits acquire their characteristic properties? We explore this question by comparing development of the circuitry for seeing and hearing, highlighting a few examples where differences in each system's sensory demands necessitate different developmental strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.