Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33414188›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2021

Characterization of a common progenitor pool of the epicardium and myocardium.

Richard C V Tyser, Ximena Ibarra-Soria, Katie McDole, Satish Arcot Jayaram, Jonathan Godwin, Teun A H van den Brand, Antonio M A Miranda, Antonio Scialdone, Philipp J Keller, John C Marioni and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Beyond Binary: Cardiac Patterning as Probabilistic Fate Restriction.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Science advances · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Elucidating Gene Functions in Congenital Heart Disease.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  9. Coordination of cardiogenesis in vivo and in vitro.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Immune-mediated cardiac development and regeneration.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Richard C V Tyser *Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, South Parks Road, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QX, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7884-1756
Ximena Ibarra-Soria *Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9387-3841
Katie McDoleHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Janelia Research Campus, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA.
Satish Arcot JayaramDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, South Parks Road, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QX, UK.
Jonathan GodwinDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, South Parks Road, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QX, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0738-6247
Teun A H van den BrandEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9335-7468
Antonio M A MirandaDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, South Parks Road, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QX, UK.
Antonio ScialdoneInstitute of Epigenetics and Stem Cells, Helmholtz Zentrum München, D-81377 München, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4956-2843
Philipp J KellerHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Janelia Research Campus, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2896-4920
John C MarioniCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK. john.marioni@cruk.cam.ac.uk shankar.srinivas@dpag.ox.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9092-0852
Shankar SrinivasDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, South Parks Road, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QX, UK. john.marioni@cruk.cam.ac.uk shankar.srinivas@dpag.ox.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5726-7791

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/18/24/33424Cancer Research UK 22231Howard Hughes Medical InstituteMedical Research Council MC_UP_1201/23Medical Research Council MR/M008975/1Wellcome Trust 103788Wellcome Trust 105031Wellcome Trust 108438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mammalian heart is derived from multiple cell lineages; however, our understanding of when and how the diverse cardiac cell types arise is limited. We mapped the origin of the embryonic mouse heart at single-cell resolution using a combination of transcriptomic, imaging, and genetic lineage labeling approaches. This mapping provided a transcriptional and anatomic definition of cardiac progenitor types. Furthermore, it revealed a cardiac progenitor pool that is anatomically and transcriptionally distinct from currently known cardiac progenitors. Besides contributing to cardiomyocytes, these cells also represent the earliest progenitor of the epicardium, a source of trophic factors and cells during cardiac development and injury. This study provides detailed insights into the formation of early cardiac cell types, with particular relevance to the development of cell-based cardiac regenerative therapies.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationGene Expression ProfilingHeartMiceMyoblasts, CardiacMyocardiumMyocytes, CardiacPericardiumSingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID33414188
PMCPMC7615359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.