Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33413833›Full record

Observational studyMayo Clinic proceedings2021

Inverse Relationship of Maximal Exercise Capacity to Hospitalization Secondary to Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Clinton A Brawner, Jonathan K Ehrman, Shane Bole, Dennis J Kerrigan, Sachin S Parikh, Barry K Lewis, Ryan M Gindi, Courtland Keteyian, Khaled Abdul-Nour, Steven J Keteyian

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Clinton A BrawnerDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI. Electronic address: cbrawne1@hfhs.org.
Jonathan K EhrmanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI.
Shane BolePublic Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI.
Dennis J KerriganDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI.
Sachin S ParikhDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI.
Barry K LewisDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI.
Ryan M GindiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI.
Courtland KeteyianPopulation Health, Henry Ford Allegiance Health, Jackson, MI.
Khaled Abdul-NourDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI.
Steven J KeteyianDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the relationship between maximal exercise capacity measured before severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and hospitalization due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

methodsWe identified patients (≥18 years) who completed a clinically indicated exercise stress test between January 1, 2016, and February 29, 2020, and had a test for SARS-CoV-2 (ie, real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction test) between February 29, 2020, and May 30, 2020. Maximal exercise capacity was quantified in metabolic equivalents of task (METs). Logistic regression was used to evaluate the likelihood that hospitalization secondary to COVID-19 is related to peak METs, with adjustment for 13 covariates previously identified as associated with higher risk for severe illness from COVID-19.

resultsWe identified 246 patients (age, 59±12 years; 42% male; 75% black race) who had an exercise test and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Among these, 89 (36%) were hospitalized. Peak METs were significantly lower (P<.001) among patients who were hospitalized (6.7±2.8) compared with those not hospitalized (8.0±2.4). Peak METs were inversely associated with the likelihood of hospitalization in unadjusted (odds ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.92) and adjusted models (odds ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76-0.99).

conclusionMaximal exercise capacity is independently and inversely associated with the likelihood of hospitalization due to COVID-19. These data further support the important relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness and health outcomes. Future studies are needed to determine whether improving maximal exercise capacity is associated with lower risk of complications due to viral infections, such as COVID-19.

Indexed as

Exercise ToleranceCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingExercise TestFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPneumonia, ViralRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33413833
PMCPMC7547590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.