Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33413601›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2021

Novel insights in dimethyl carbonate-based extraction of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB).

Beatrice Mongili, Annalisa Abdel Azim, Silvia Fraterrigo Garofalo, Esperanza Batuecas, Angela Re, Sergio Bocchini, Debora Fino

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. The Role of Bacterial Polyhydroalkanoate (PHA) in a Sustainable Future: A Review on the Biological Diversity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Beatrice MongiliDepartment of Science and Applied Technology (DISAT), Polytechnic University of Turin, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129, Turin, Italy.
Annalisa Abdel AzimCentre for Sustainable Future Technology (CSFT), Italian Institute of Technology, Via Livorno 60, 10144, Turin, Italy. annalisa.abdelazim@iit.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6664-500X
Silvia Fraterrigo GarofaloDepartment of Science and Applied Technology (DISAT), Polytechnic University of Turin, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129, Turin, Italy.
Esperanza BatuecasThermal and Fluid Engineering Department, Carlos III University of Madrid, Avenida de la Universidad 30, 28911, Leganés, Madrid, Spain.
Angela ReCentre for Sustainable Future Technology (CSFT), Italian Institute of Technology, Via Livorno 60, 10144, Turin, Italy.
Sergio BocchiniCentre for Sustainable Future Technology (CSFT), Italian Institute of Technology, Via Livorno 60, 10144, Turin, Italy.
Debora FinoDepartment of Science and Applied Technology (DISAT), Polytechnic University of Turin, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129, Turin, Italy.
Italian Institute of Technology · ITPolitecnico di Torino · ITUniversidad Carlos III de Madrid · ES

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 679050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlastic plays a crucial role in everyday life of human living, nevertheless it represents an undeniable source of land and water pollution. Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) is a bio-based and biodegradable polyester, which can be naturally produced by microorganisms capable of converting and accumulating carbon as intracellular granules. Hence, PHB-producing strains stand out as an alternative source to fossil-derived counterparts. However, the extraction strategy affects the recovery efficiency and the quality of PHB. In this study, PHB was produced by a genetically modified Escherichia coli strain and successively extracted using dimethyl carbonate (DMC) and ethanol as alternative solvent and polishing agent to chloroform and hexane. Eventually, a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) study was performed for evaluating the environmental and health impact of using DMC.

resultsExtraction yield and purity of PHB obtained via DMC, were quantified, and compared with those obtained via chloroform-based extraction. PHB yield values from DMC-based extraction were similar to or higher than those achieved by using chloroform (≥ 67%). To optimize the performance of extraction via DMC, different experimental conditions were tested, varying the biomass state (dry or wet) and the mixing time, in presence or in absence of a paper filter. Among 60, 90, 120 min, the mid-value allowed to achieve high extraction yield, both for dry and wet biomass. Physical and molecular dependence on the biomass state and solvent/antisolvent choice was established. The comparative LCA analysis promoted the application of DMC/ethanol rather than chloroform/hexane, as the best choice in terms of health prevention. However, an elevated impact score was achieved by DMC in the environmental-like categories in contrast with a minor contribution by its counterpart.

conclusionThe multifaceted exploration of DMC-based PHB extraction herein reported extends the knowledge of the variables affecting PHB purification process. This work offers novel and valuable insights into PHB extraction process, including environmental aspects not discussed so far. The findings of our research question the DMC as a green solvent, though also the choice of the antisolvent can influence the impact on the examined categories.

Indexed as

Dimethyl carbonateExtraction yieldLCA analysisMultifactorial experimentsPolyhydroxybutyrateSolvent-based extraction

Identifiers

PMID33413601
PMCPMC7792028
OpenAlexW3118406292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.