Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33413491›Full record

Trial reportImplementation science : IS2021

Economic evaluation of a web-based menu planning intervention to improve childcare service adherence with dietary guidelines.

Penny Reeves, Kim Edmunds, Zoe Szewczyk, Alice Grady, Sze Lin Yoong, Luke Wolfenden, Rebecca Wyse, Meghan Finch, Fiona Stacey, John Wiggers and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Interventions to prevent obesity in children aged 2 to 4 years old.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Methods for the economic evaluation of obesity prevention dietary interventions in children: A systematic review and critical appraisal of the evidence.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Characterisation of At-Scale Community Health Interventions Aimed to Improve Healthy Eating Behaviour in Australia: A Rapid Review.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Penny ReevesHunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI), New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia. Penny.reeves@hmri.org.au.ORCID 0000-0001-7335-8765
Kim EdmundsHunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI), New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia.
Zoe SzewczykHunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI), New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia.
Alice GradySchool of Medicine and Public health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia.
Sze Lin YoongSchool of Medicine and Public health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia.
Luke WolfendenSchool of Medicine and Public health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia.
Rebecca WyseSchool of Medicine and Public health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia.
Meghan FinchHunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI), New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia.
Fiona StaceyHunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, New South Wales, 2287, Australia.
John WiggersSchool of Medicine and Public health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia.
Andrew SearlesHunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI), New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the known benefits of healthy eating in childhood, few Australian childcare services provide food that is consistent with dietary guidelines. The effectiveness of a web-based menu planning intervention to increase childcare service provision of healthy foods and decrease provision of discretionary foods in long day-care services in Australia was assessed in a randomised controlled trial. Here we consider the costs, consequences, cost-effectiveness and budget impact of the intervention using data collected within the trial.

methodsThe prospective trial-based economic evaluation involved 54 childcare services across New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Services were randomised to a 12-month intervention or usual care. The intervention involved access to a web-based menu planning and decision support tool and online resources. Effectiveness measures included mean number of food groups, overall menu and individual food group compliance with dietary guidelines, and mean servings of food groups at 12 months. Costs (reported in $AUD, 2017/18) were evaluated from both health sector and societal perspectives. The direct cost to support uptake of the intervention was calculated, as were costs to each childcare service. The incremental cost of the intervention was calculated as the net difference in the cost to undertake menu planning and review plus the direct cost of the intervention. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) including uncertainty intervals were estimated for differences in costs and effects between intervention and control groups. A relative value index was calculated to determine overall value for money.

resultsOver the 12 months of the trial, we calculated a difference in cost between usual practice and intervention groups of - $482 (95% UI - $859, - $56). While the measured increase in menu and food group compliance within the trial did not reach statistical significance, there were significant improvements in mean servings of fruit and discretionary food, represented in the cost-consequence analysis. The calculated relative value index of 1.1 suggests that the intervention returns acceptable value for money for the outcomes generated.

conclusionCompared to usual practice, web-based programmes may offer an efficient and sustainable alternative for childcare services to improve the provision of healthy foods to children in their care.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12616000974404.

Indexed as

Food ServicesMenu PlanningAustraliaChildChild Day Care CentersCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth PromotionHumansInternetNutrition PolicyProspective StudiesChildhood obesity preventionCost-consequenceDietary interventionEconomic evaluation

Identifiers

PMID33413491
PMCPMC7789335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.