Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33413488›Full record

ReviewNutrition & metabolism2021

Milk consumption and multiple health outcomes: umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in humans.

Xingxia Zhang, Xinrong Chen, Yujie Xu, Jie Yang, Liang Du, Ka Li, Yong Zhou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrition & metabolism, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xingxia ZhangWest China School of Nursing/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Rd, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Xinrong ChenWest China School of Nursing/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Rd, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Yujie XuDepartment of Public Health, School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Jie YangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Rd, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
Liang DuChinese Evidence-Based Medicine/Cochrane Center, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Ka LiWest China School of Nursing/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Rd, Chengdu, 610041, China. lika127@126.com.
Yong ZhouDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Rd, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China. nutritioner@hotmail.com.

Funding

Chinese Medical Board Grant on Evidence-Based Medicine, New York, USA 98-680National Natural Science Foundation of China 71974135Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province (CN) 30901427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to recapitulate the best available evidence of milk consumption and multiple health-related outcomes, we performed an umbrella review of meta-analyses and systematic reviews in humans. Totally, 41 meta-analyses with 45 unique health outcomes were included. Milk consumption was more often related to benefits than harm to a sequence of health-related outcomes. Dose-response analyses indicated that an increment of 200 ml (approximately 1 cup) milk intake per day was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease, stroke, hypertension, colorectal cancer, metabolic syndrome, obesity and osteoporosis. Beneficial associations were also found for type 2 diabetes mellitus and Alzheimer's disease. Conversely, milk intake might be associated with higher risk of prostate cancer, Parkinson's disease, acne and Fe-deficiency anaemia in infancy. Potential allergy or lactose intolerance need for caution. Milk consumption does more good than harm for human health in this umbrella review. Our results support milk consumption as part of a healthy diet. More well-designed randomized controlled trials are warranted.

Indexed as

HealthMeta-analysisMilkSystematic reviewUmbrella review

Identifiers

PMID33413488
PMCPMC7789627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.