Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33413402›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2021

Knowledge and practices regarding malaria and the National Treatment Guidelines among public health workers in Equatorial Guinea.

Marta Blanco, Pablo Suárez-Sanchez, Belén García, Jesús Nzang, Policarpo Ncogo, Matilde Riloha, Pedro Berzosa, Agustín Benito, María Romay-Barja

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marta BlancoCentro Nacional de Medicina Tropical, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Pablo Suárez-SanchezCentro Nacional de Medicina Tropical, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Belén GarcíaCentro Nacional de Medicina Tropical, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Jesús NzangCentro Nacional de Medicina Tropical, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Policarpo NcogoCentro Nacional de Medicina Tropical, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Matilde RilohaMinisterio de Salud y Bienestar Social, Malabo, Equatorial Guinea.
Pedro BerzosaCentro Nacional de Medicina Tropical, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Agustín BenitoCentro Nacional de Medicina Tropical, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
María Romay-BarjaCentro Nacional de Medicina Tropical, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. mromay@isciii.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0177-6885
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESNational University of Equatorial Guinea · GQ

Funding

Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo AECID2017/CTR/0900237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2018, an estimated 228 million cases of malaria occurred worldwide. Countries are far from having achieved reasonable levels of national protocol compliance among health workers. Lack of awareness of treatment protocols and treatment resistance by prescribers threatens to undermine progress when it comes to reducing the prevalence of this disease. This study sought to evaluate the degree of knowledge and practices regarding malaria diagnosis and treatment amongst prescribers working at the public health facilities of Bata, Equatorial Guinea.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted in October-December 2017 amongst all public health professionals who attended patients under the age of 15 years, with suspected malaria in the Bata District of Equatorial Guinea. Practitioners were asked about their practices and knowledge of malaria and the National Malaria Treatment Guidelines. A bivariate analysis and a logistic regression model were used to determine factors associated with their knowledge.

resultsAmong the 44 practitioners interviewed, 59.1% worked at a Health Centre and 40.9% at the District Hospital of Bata. Important differences in knowledge and practices between hospital and health centre workers were found. Clinical diagnosis was more frequently by practitioners at the health centres (p = 0.059), while microscopy confirmation was more frequent at regional hospital (100%). Intramuscular artemether was the anti-malarial most administrated at the health centres (50.0%), while artemether-lumefantrine was the treatment most used at the regional hospital (66.7%). Most practitioners working at public health facilities (63.6%) have a low level of knowledge regarding the National Malaria Treatment Guidelines. While knowledge regarding malaria, the National Malaria Treatment Guidelines and treatment resistances is low, it was higher amongst hospital workers than amongst practitioners at health centres.

conclusionsIt is essential to reinforce practitioners' knowledge, treatment and diagnosis practices and use of the National Malaria Treatment Guidelines in order to improve malaria case management and disease control in the region. A specific malaria training programme ensuring ongoing updates training is necessary in order to ensure that greater experience does not entail obsolete knowledge and, consequently, inadequate diagnosis and treatment practices.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEquatorial GuineaFemaleGuidelines as TopicHealth PersonnelHumansMalariaMaleMiddle AgedPublic HealthBehaviorMalariaPractitionersProtocolsTreatment

Identifiers

PMID33413402
PMCPMC7789308
OpenAlexW3120055358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.