Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33413396›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2021

Pharmacist led homeless outreach engagement and non-medical independent prescribing (Rx) (PHOENIx) intervention for people experiencing homelessness: a non- randomised feasibility study.

Richard Lowrie, Kate Stock, Sharon Lucey, Megan Knapp, Andrea Williamson, Margaret Montgomery, Cian Lombard, Donogh Maguire, Rachael Allan, Rebecca Blair and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-pharmaceutical primary care interventions to improve mental health in deprived populations: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Treatment burden for people experiencing homelessness with a recent non-fatal overdose: a questionnaire study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Richard LowrieHomeless Health, Pharmacy Services, Clarkston Court, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, 56 Busby Road, Clarkston, Glasgow, G76 7AT, UK. Richard.lowrie@ggc.scot.nhs.uk.
Kate StockHomeless Health, Pharmacy Services, Clarkston Court, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, 56 Busby Road, Clarkston, Glasgow, G76 7AT, UK.
Sharon LuceySimon Community Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Megan KnappSimon Community Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Andrea WilliamsonDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Margaret MontgomeryHomeless Health, Pharmacy Services, Clarkston Court, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, 56 Busby Road, Clarkston, Glasgow, G76 7AT, UK.
Cian LombardAcute Homeless Liaison Team, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Donogh MaguireEmergency Department, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Rachael AllanHomelessness Health Service, Hunter St, Glasgow, UK.
Rebecca BlairHomeless Health, Pharmacy Services, Clarkston Court, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, 56 Busby Road, Clarkston, Glasgow, G76 7AT, UK.
Vibhu PaudyalUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Frances S MairDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHomelessness and associated mortality and multimorbidity rates are increasing. Systematic reviews have demonstrated a lack of complex interventions that decrease unscheduled emergency health services utilisation or increase scheduled care. Better evidence is needed to inform policy responses. We examined the feasibility of a complex intervention (PHOENIx: Pharmacist led Homeless Outreach Engagement Nonmedical Independent prescribing (Rx)) to inform a subsequent pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT).

methodsNon-randomised trial with Usual Care (UC) comparator group set in Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board, Scotland. Participants were adult inpatients experiencing homelessness in a city centre Glasgow hospital, referred to the PHOENIx team at the point of hospital discharge, from 19th March 2018 until 6th April 2019. The follow up period for each patient started on the day the patient was first seen (Intervention group) or first referred (UC), until 24th August 2019, the censor date for all patients. All patients were offered and agreed to receive serial consultations with the PHOENIx team (NHS Pharmacist prescriber working with Simon Community Scotland (third sector homeless charity worker)). Patients who could not be reached by the PHOENIx team were allocated to the UC group. The PHOENIx intervention included assessment of physical/mental health, addictions, housing, benefits and social activities followed by pharmacist prescribing with referral to other health service specialities as necessary. All participants received primary (including specialist homelessness health service based general practitioner care, mental health and addictions services) and secondary care. Main outcome measures were rates of: recruitment; retention; uptake of the intervention; and completeness of collected data, from recruitment to censor date.

resultsTwenty four patients were offered and agreed to participate; 12 were reached and received the intervention as planned with a median 7.5 consultations (IQR3.0-14.2) per patient. The pharmacist prescribed a median of 2 new (IQR0.3-3.8) and 2 repeat (1.3-7.0) prescriptions per patient; 10(83%) received support for benefits, housing or advocacy. Twelve patients were not subsequently contactable after leaving hospital, despite agreeing to participate, and were assigned to UC. Two patients in the UC group died of drug/alcohol overdose during follow up; no patients in the Intervention group died. All 24 patients were retained in the intervention or UC group until death or censor date and all patient records were accessible at follow up: 11(92%) visited ED in both groups, with 11(92%) hospitalisations in intervention group, 9(75%) UC. Eight (67%) intervention group patients and 3(25%) UC patients attended scheduled out patient appointments.

conclusionsFeasibility testing of the PHOENIx intervention suggests merit in a subsequent pilot RCT.

Indexed as

Community-Institutional RelationsProfessional-Patient RelationsAdultAppointments and SchedulesCommunity Pharmacy ServicesFeasibility StudiesGeneral PractitionersHumansIll-Housed PersonsMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePharmacistsReferral and ConsultationScotlandHomelessness inequality policy servicePharmacistPrescribing

Identifiers

PMID33413396
PMCPMC7789612
OpenAlexW3112241098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.