Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33413391›Full record

ArticleCancer cell international2021

Automatic model for cervical cancer screening based on convolutional neural network: a retrospective, multicohort, multicenter study.

Xiangyu Tan, Kexin Li, Jiucheng Zhang, Wenzhe Wang, Bian Wu, Jian Wu, Xiaoping Li, Xiaoyuan Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer cell international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Deep dive into deep learning methods for cervical cancer detection and classification.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiangyu TanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430030, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Kexin LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430030, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Jiucheng ZhangCollege of Computer Science & Technology, Zhejiang University, 310027, Hangzhou, China.
Wenzhe WangCollege of Computer Science & Technology, Zhejiang University, 310027, Hangzhou, China.
Bian WuData Science and AI Lab, WeDoctor Group Limited, 311200, Hangzhou, China.
Jian WuSchool of Public Health, Zhejiang University, 310027, Hangzhou, China.
Xiaoping LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430030, Wuhan, Hubei, China. xiaopingli11@163.com.
Xiaoyuan HuangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430030, Wuhan, Hubei, China. huangxy@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7684-6294

Funding

Hubei Technological Innovation Special Fund 2018ACA138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence rates of cervical cancer in developing countries have been steeply increasing while the medical resources for prevention, detection, and treatment are still quite limited. Computer-based deep learning methods can achieve high-accuracy fast cancer screening. Such methods can lead to early diagnosis, effective treatment, and hopefully successful prevention of cervical cancer. In this work, we seek to construct a robust deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) model that can assist pathologists in screening cervical cancer.

methodsThinPrep cytologic test (TCT) images diagnosed by pathologists from many collaborating hospitals in different regions were collected. The images were divided into a training dataset (13,775 images), validation dataset (2301 images), and test dataset (408,030 images from 290 scanned copies) for training and effect evaluation of a faster region convolutional neural network (Faster R-CNN) system.

resultsThe sensitivity and specificity of the proposed cervical cancer screening system was 99.4 and 34.8%, respectively, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.67. The model could also distinguish between negative and positive cells. The sensitivity values of the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), the low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), and the high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) were 89.3, 71.5, and 73.9%, respectively. This system could quickly classify the images and generate a test report in about 3 minutes. Hence, the system can reduce the burden on the pathologists and saves them valuable time to analyze more complex cases.

conclusionsIn our study, a CNN-based TCT cervical-cancer screening model was established through a retrospective study of multicenter TCT images. This model shows improved speed and accuracy for cervical cancer screening, and helps overcome the shortage of medical resources required for cervical cancer screening.

Indexed as

Cervical cancerConvolutional neural network (CNN)Deep leaningThinPrep cytologic test (TCT)

Identifiers

PMID33413391
PMCPMC7791865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.