Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33413388›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2021

Variation of physical durability between LLIN products and net use environments: summary of findings from four African countries.

Albert Kilian, Emmanuel Obi, Paul Mansiangi, Ana Paula Abílio, Khamis Ameir Haji, Sean Blaufuss, Bolanle Olapeju, Stella Babalola, Hannah Koenker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Bioefficacy and durability of OlysetInfectious diseases of poverty · 2021
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Durability study of VeeralinParasites & vectors · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Albert KilianPMI VectorWorks Project, Tropical Health LLP, Montagut, Spain. albert@trophealth.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3361-7480
Emmanuel ObiPMI VectorWorks Project, Tropical Health LLP, Abuja, Nigeria.
Paul MansiangiEcole de Santé Publique, Université de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Ana Paula AbílioInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Khamis Ameir HajiZanzibar Malaria Elimination Programme, Stone Town, Zanzibar, Tanzania.
Sean BlaufussPMI VectorWorks Project, JHU Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Bolanle OlapejuPMI VectorWorks Project, JHU Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Stella BabalolaPMI VectorWorks Project, JHU Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Hannah KoenkerPMI VectorWorks Project, JHU Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USInstituto Nacional de Saúde · MZInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEUniversity of Kinshasa · CDZanzibar University · TZ

Funding

United States Agency for International Development AID-OAA-A-14-00057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical durability of long-lasting-insecticidal nets (LLIN) is an important aspect of the effectiveness of LLIN as a malaria prevention tool, but there is limited data on performance across locations and products. This secondary analysis of data from the VectorWorks project from 10 sites in four African countries involving six LLIN brands provides such data.

methodsA total of 4672 campaign nets from 1976 households were recruited into prospective cohort studies 2-6 months after distribution through campaigns and followed for 3 years in Mozambique, Nigeria, DRC and Zanzibar, Tanzania. LLIN products included two 100 denier polyester LLIN (DawaPlus

resultsDefinite outcomes for physical durability were obtained for 75% of study nets. After 31 to 37 months survival in serviceable condition varied between sites by 63 percentage-points, from 17 to 80%. Median survival varied by 3.7 years, from 1.6 to 5.3 years. Similar magnitude of variation was seen for polyethylene and polyester LLIN and for the same brand. Cox regression showed increasing net care attitude in combination with exposure to net related messages to be the strongest explanatory variable of survival. However, differences between countries also remained significant. In contrast, no difference was seen for LLIN material types.

conclusionsVariation in net use environment and net care is the main reason for differences in the physical durability of LLIN products in different locations. While some of these factors have been identified to work across countries, other factors remain poorly defined and further investigation is needed in this area. Grouping LLIN brands by similar textile characteristics, such as material or yarn strength, is insufficient to distinguish LLIN product performance suggesting a more differentiated, composite metric is needed.

Indexed as

Democratic Republic of the CongoFamily CharacteristicsInsecticide-Treated BednetsMalariaMosquito ControlMozambiqueNigeriaResidence CharacteristicsTanzaniaLLIN physical durabilityTextile resistance to damage

Identifiers

PMID33413388
PMCPMC7791654
OpenAlexW3120355479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.