Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33413381›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Using Lean Six Sigma techniques to improve efficiency in outpatient ophthalmology clinics.

Andrew W Kam, Scott Collins, Tae Park, Michael Mihail, Fiona F Stanaway, Noni L Lewis, Daniel Polya, Samantha Fraser-Bell, Timothy V Roberts, James E H Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrew W KamDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Scott CollinsNorthern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Tae ParkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Michael MihailDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Fiona F StanawaySydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Noni L LewisDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Daniel PolyaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Samantha Fraser-BellDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Timothy V RobertsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
James E H SmithDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia. drjehsmith@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing patient numbers, complexity of patient management, and healthcare resource limitations have resulted in prolonged patient wait times, decreased quality of service, and decreased patient satisfaction in many outpatient services worldwide. This study investigated the impact of Lean Six Sigma, a service improvement methodology originally from manufacturing, in reducing patient wait times and increasing service capacity in a publicly-funded, tertiary referral outpatient ophthalmology clinic.

methodsThis quality improvement study compared results from two five-months audits of operational data pre- and post-implementation of Lean Six Sigma. A baseline audit was conducted to determine duration and variability of patient in-clinic time and number of patients seen per clinic session. Staff interviews and a time-in-motion study were conducted to identify issues reducing clinic service efficiency. Solutions were developed to address these root causes including: clinic schedule amendments, creation of dedicated postoperative clinics, and clear documentation templates. A post-implementation audit was conducted, and the results compared with baseline audit data. Significant differences in patient in-clinic time pre- and post-solution implementation were assessed using Mann-Whitney test. Differences in variability of patient in-clinic times were assessed using Brown-Forsythe test. Differences in numbers of patients seen per clinic session were assessed using Student's t-test.

resultsDuring the baseline audit period, 19.4 patients were seen per 240-minute clinic session. Median patient in-clinic time was 131 minutes with an interquartile range of 133 minutes (84-217 minutes, quartile 1- quartile 3). Targeted low/negligible cost solutions were implemented to reduce in-clinic times. During the post-implementation audit period, the number of patients seen per session increased 9% to 21.1 (p = 0.016). There was significant reduction in duration (p < 0.001) and variability (p < 0.001) of patient in-clinic time (median 107 minutes, interquartile range 91 minutes [71-162 minutes]).

conclusionsLean Six Sigma techniques may be used to reduce duration and variability of patient in-clinic time and increase service capacity in outpatient ophthalmology clinics without additional resource input.

Indexed as

OphthalmologyTotal Quality ManagementAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAppointments and SchedulesEfficiency, OrganizationalHumansOutpatientsLeanLean Six SigmaOphthalmologyOutpatientsPatient waiting timesPublic healthService improvementSix Sigma

Identifiers

PMID33413381
PMCPMC7792026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.