Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33413380›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2021

Isolation of Mycobacterium avium and other nontuberculous mycobacteria in chickens and captive birds in peninsular Malaysia.

Abdul Sattar, Zunita Zakaria, Jalila Abu, Saleha A Aziz, Gabriel Rojas-Ponce

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Genomic Characterisation of Antibiotic-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Isolation of Multidrug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Abdul SattarFaculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water and Marine Sciences, Uthal, Balochistan, 90150, Pakistan.
Zunita ZakariaDepartment of Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia UPM, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. zunita@upm.edu.my.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1792-6128
Jalila AbuDepartment of Clinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia UPM, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Saleha A AzizDepartment of Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia UPM, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Gabriel Rojas-PonceDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 2V4, Canada.
Universiti Putra Malaysia · MYUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

Akademi Sains Malaysia 9594500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMycobacterium avium complex (MAC) causes a chronic infectious in the birds known as avian mycobacteriosis. Almost all species of the birds are susceptible to MAC which consists of two closely related species of mycobacteria, that is, M. avium and M. intracellulare. This study aimed to determine the occurrence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium (MAA) in chickens and captive birds in selected states of Peninsular Malaysia.

resultsA 300 fecal samples were collected from village chickens (n = 100), layer chickens (n = 100) and captive birds (n = 100). Fecal samples were split into two aliquots for microbiological and molecular detection of MAA. Microbiology detection consisted of microscopy (Ziehl-Neelsen staining) and culture of samples decontaminated with 1% Cetylperidinium chloride and vancomycin, nalidixic acid and amphotericin B (VNA) antibiotic cocktail [vancomycin (VAN) 100 μg/ml, nalidixic acid (NAL) 100 μg/ml and amphotericin B (AMB) 50 μg/ml] onto Löwenstein-Jensen (L-J). Molecular detection (PCR-IS901) was performed to detect MAA DNA from the feces and PCR-16S rRNA and IS901 for identification of genus Mycobacterium and Mycobacterium avium sub species avium isolated onto L-J. All samples (296) were AFB negative smear. M. avium was isolated in 0.3% (1/296) samples by culture and detected in 2.5% (6/242) samples by PCR (IS901). Other mycobacteria were found in 1.7% (5/296) chickens. Of five isolates, two were identified as Mycobacterium terrae and M. engbaekii and remaining isolates were not sequenced. Birds positive for M. avium included White Pelican (n = 1) Black Hornbill (n = 1), Macaw (n = 2), Cockatoo (n = 2) and village chicken (n = 1).

conclusionIt is concluded that chickens and birds were infected with M. avium in selected areas of Peninsular Malaysia. Although, PCR is rapid, reliable and cost effective method for detection of M. avium in a subclinical stage, the culture of the avian feces should still be used as a reference test for the diagnosis of avian tuberculosis.

Indexed as

AnimalsBirdsChickensDNA, BacterialFecesMalaysiaMycobacteriumNontuberculous MycobacteriaPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16STuberculosis, AvianDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAvian tuberculosisCetylperidinium chlorideCultureIS901Löwenstein JensenMycobacterium avium subsp. aviumPCRPeninsular Malaysia

Identifiers

PMID33413380
PMCPMC7791791
OpenAlexW3120793516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.