Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33413357›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Influence of participation in a quality improvement collaborative on staff perceptions of organizational sustainability.

James H Ford, Aaron Gilson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00934141 (Randomized Control Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00934141 phase3completednot on this map

Randomized Control Trial (RCT) Evaluating Improvement Strategies in Addiction Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Wisconsin, MadisonRan2006 to 2011Enrolled201ConditionsAddictionArmsLearning Session, Interest Circle Calls, Coaching, Website
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James H FordUniversity of Wisconsin - Madison School of Pharmacy, 777 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA. jhfordii@wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3045-2414
Aaron GilsonUniversity of Wisconsin - Madison School of Pharmacy, 777 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

RCT Evaluating Improvement Strategies for Addiction TxR01DA020832 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GUSTAFSON, DAVID H · 2006 to 2010
$7.3M
Stagewise Implementation-To-Target- Medications for Addiction Treatment (SITT-MAT)R01DA052975 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, JAMES H, MCGOVERN, MARK P · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
Sustainability of Change within a Quality Improvement CollaborativeR21DA036700 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI FORD, JAMES H · 2014 to 2015
$434k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA020232NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA020832NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA052975NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA036700NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA36700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSustainability capacity (SC), which is an organization's ability to implement and maintain change, is influenced by internal attributes, environmental contextual influencers, and intervention attributes. Temporal changes in staff SC perceptions, as well as the influence of quality improvement collaborative (QIC) participation, has generally not been explored. This project addresses this gap, measuring staff SC perceptions at four time points (baseline and every 9 months) for clinics participating in an intervention - the Network for the Improvement of Addiction Treatment QIC initiative (called NIATx200).

methodsA mixed linear model repeated measures analysis was applied to matched staff members (n = 908, representing 2329 total cases) across the evaluation timeframe. Three separate statistical models assessed potential predictors of SC perceptions: Time (Models I-III); NIATx200 intervention, staff job function, and tenure (Models II &III); and NIATx200 participation hours and four organizational variables (Model III).

resultsFor Model I, staff perceptions of total SC increased throughout most of the study (t

conclusionAlthough staff exposure to sustainability principals was minimal in NIATx200, staff perceptions about their organization's SC significantly differed over time. However, an organization's participation level in a QIC became the principal predictor of staff SC perceptions, regardless of other factors' influence. Given these findings, it is possible to develop and introduce specific sustainability content within the structure of a QIC to assess the impact on staff SC perceptions over time and the sustainment of organizational change.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov , NCT00934141 . Registered July 6, 2009. Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesOrganizational InnovationQuality ImprovementHumansOrganizationsInterventionNIATxParticipationQuality improvement collaborativeStaff perceptionsSustainability

Identifiers

PMID33413357
PMCPMC7791971
OpenAlexW3117496902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.