Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33413337›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Patient-controlled admission contracts: a longitudinal study of patient evaluations.

Olav Nyttingnes, Jūratė Šaltytė Benth, Torleif Ruud

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03609515 (Patient-controlled Admissions in Inpatient Mental Health Services), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03609515 nacompletednot on this map

Patient-controlled Admissions in Inpatient Mental Health Services

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AkershusRan2011 to 2012Enrolled58ConditionsPsychoses, Affective DisorderArmsPatient-controlled admission
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. From safety to agency: experiences of self-admission among patients with diverse mental health needs.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  3. Continuity of care and therapeutic relationships as critical elements in acute psychiatric care.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Olav NyttingnesDivision of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, PB 1000, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway. olav.nyttingnes@ahus.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0991-7176
Jūratė Šaltytė BenthHealth Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Torleif RuudDivision of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, PB 1000, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health professionals usually decide patients' access to inpatient care to ensure care based on need and potential benefit. The purpose of the current study is to investigate how patients evaluate admissions under a contract of Patient-Controlled Admissions (PCA), where the patient could initiate 5 day stays at a community mental health center at their own discretion.

methodsPatients with a PCA contract in 2011 and 2012 were invited to participate in the study. Staff first recorded clinical baseline values for patients. Towards the end of each PCA stay, staff conducted a structured discharge interview of the admission with the patient. A structured follow-up interview evaluating the PCA arrangement 2 years after inclusion was also performed. We report frequencies from data on PCA requests, PCA admissions and the 2 year evaluation interview, and we used multiple regression models to explore predictors of perceived helpfulness and improvement from the PCA admissions.

resultsThe included patients (n = 74) made 628 requests for PCAs during the 2 years after inclusion, and 507 PCAs took place. The five-day limit could not be upheld in 7.5% of PCAs. Patients rated PCAs as helping considerably (33.1%), a good deal (30.4%) or somewhat (21.1%), and reported feeling considerably (15.2%), a good deal (26.2%) or somewhat (36.3%) better during the admission. Significant predictors of helpfulness and feeling better were socializing more during the stay and reporting higher motivation to get away from a difficult situation or getting to the ward safety and calmness. A diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum or bipolar disorder and more services from mental health specialist care also predicted feeling better during the PCA. In the two-year follow-up interview, 90% rated themselves as very or quite satisfied, and more than 90% would recommend PCAs to others.

conclusionsThe PCA arrangement was feasible and was frequently utilized by patients. Patients were satisfied with PCAs and the PCA arrangement. These short stays seemed particularly helpful for patients with a more severe diagnosis. Strong patient satisfaction gives reasons for testing and implementing increased patient influence on the mental health admission procedures in the form of PCAs.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingMental DisordersPatient AdmissionPatient ParticipationAdultAgedCommunity Mental Health CentersFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHospitalizationHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAdmission proceduresInpatient careMental health carePatient autonomySevere mental disordersUser participation

Identifiers

PMID33413337
PMCPMC7791868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.