Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33413325›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Cross-cultural adaptation and exploratory factor analysis of the Person-centred Practice Inventory - Staff (PCPI-S) questionnaire among Malaysian primary healthcare providers.

Nur Zahirah Balqis-Ali, Pui San Saw, Anis Syakira Jailani, Weng Hong Fun, Noridah Mohd Saleh, Tengku Putri Zaharah Tengku Bahanuddin, Sondi Sararaks, Shaun Wen Huey Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Person-Centered Practice in Hospitalized Older Adults with Chronic Illness: Clinical Study Protocol.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nur Zahirah Balqis-AliCentre for Health Outcomes Research, Institute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Block B2, No. 1, Jalan Setia Murni U13/52, Seksyen U13 Bandar Setia Alam, 40170, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. dr.nurbalqis@moh.gov.my.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1590-5457
Pui San SawSchool of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia.
Anis Syakira JailaniCentre for Health Outcomes Research, Institute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Block B2, No. 1, Jalan Setia Murni U13/52, Seksyen U13 Bandar Setia Alam, 40170, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.
Weng Hong FunCentre for Health Outcomes Research, Institute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Block B2, No. 1, Jalan Setia Murni U13/52, Seksyen U13 Bandar Setia Alam, 40170, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.
Noridah Mohd SalehFamily Health Development Division, Ministry of Health Malaysia, 62590, Putrajaya, Malaysia.
Tengku Putri Zaharah Tengku BahanuddinFamily Health Development Division, Ministry of Health Malaysia, 62590, Putrajaya, Malaysia.
Sondi SararaksCentre for Health Outcomes Research, Institute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Block B2, No. 1, Jalan Setia Murni U13/52, Seksyen U13 Bandar Setia Alam, 40170, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.
Shaun Wen Huey LeeSchool of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia.

Funding

Ministry of Health Malaysia NMRR-18-309-40447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Person-centred Practice Inventory-Staff (PCPI-S) instrument was developed to measure healthcare providers' perception towards their person-centred practice. The study aimed to explore the influence of culture, context, language and local practice towards the PCPI-S instrument adaptation process for use among public primary care healthcare providers in Malaysia.

methodsThe original PCPI-S was reviewed and adapted for cultural suitability by an expert committee to ensure conceptual and item equivalence. The instrument was subsequently translated into the local Malay language using the forward-backward translation by two independent native speakers, and modified following pre-tests involving cognitive debriefing interviews. The psychometric properties of the corresponding instrument were determined by assessing the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and correlation of the instrument, while the underlying structure was analysed using exploratory factor analysis.

resultsReview by expert committee found items applicable to local context. Pre-tests on the translated instrument found multiple domains and questions were misinterpreted. Many translations were heavily influenced by culture, context, and language discrepancies. Results of the subsequent pilot study found mean scores for all items ranged from 2.92 to 4.39. Notable ceiling effects were found. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha > 0.9). Exploratory factor analysis found formation of 11 components as opposed to the original 17 constructs.

conclusionThe results of this study provide evidence regarding the reliability and underlying structure of the PCPI-S instrument with regard to primary care practice. Culture, context, language and local practice heavily influenced the adaptation as well as interpretation of the underlying structure and should be given emphasis when translating person-centred into practice.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonPatient-Centered CareTranslationsFactor Analysis, StatisticalHealth PersonnelHumansMalaysiaPilot ProjectsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesCross-cultural adaptationHealthcare providerMalaysiaPCPI-SPerson-centredPrimary careQuestionnaire validation

Identifiers

PMID33413325
PMCPMC7792065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.