Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33413252›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Knowledge, attitudes and practices on influenza vaccination during pregnancy in Quito, Ecuador.

Carlos E Erazo, Carlos V Erazo, Mario J Grijalva, Ana L Moncayo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron Variant.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Carlos E ErazoCentro de Investigación para la Salud en América Latina (CISeAL), Escuela de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Apartado, 1701-2184, Quito, Ecuador.
Carlos V ErazoFacultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Apartado, 1701-2184, Quito, Ecuador.
Mario J GrijalvaCentro de Investigación para la Salud en América Latina (CISeAL), Escuela de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Apartado, 1701-2184, Quito, Ecuador.
Ana L MoncayoCentro de Investigación para la Salud en América Latina (CISeAL), Escuela de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Apartado, 1701-2184, Quito, Ecuador. amoncayo708@puce.edu.ec.ORCID 0000-0003-3592-7503
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador · EC

Funding

Regional Training Center for Tropical Disease Research in Quito-EcuadorD43TW008261 · FIC · OHIO UNIVERSITY ATHENS · PI GRIJALVA, MARIO J · 2010 to 2015
$795k
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW008261National Institutes of Health (US) TW008261Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador M13398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccination is the most effective way to prevent infection and severe outcomes caused by influenza viruses in pregnant women and their children. In Ecuador, the coverage of seasonal influenza vaccination in pregnant women is low. The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of pregnant women toward influenza vaccination in Quito-Ecuador.

methodsA cross-sectional study enrolled 842 women who delivered at three main public gynecological-obstetric units of the Metropolitan District of Quito. A questionnaire regarding demographics, antenatal care, risk conditions and knowledge, attitudes and practices related to influenza vaccination was administered. We examined factors associated with vaccination using log-binomial regression models.

resultsA low vaccination rate (36.6%) against influenza was observed among pregnant women. The factors associated with vaccination included the recommendations from health providers (adjusted PR: 15.84; CI 95% 9.62-26.10), belief in the safety of the influenza vaccine (adjusted PR: 1.53; CI 95% 1.03-2.37) and antenatal care (adjusted PR: 1.21; CI 95% 1.01-1.47). The most common reasons for not vaccinating included the lack of recommendation from health care providers (73.9%) and lack of access to vaccine (9.0%).

conclusionsHealth educational programs aimed at pregnant women and antenatal care providers have the most potential to increase influenza vaccination rates. Further studies are needed to understand the barriers of health care providers regarding influenza vaccination in Ecuador.

Indexed as

Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesPregnancy Complications, InfectiousChildCross-Sectional StudiesEcuadorFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPregnancyPregnant PeopleVaccinationInfluenza VaccinesEcuadorHealth providersInfluenzaInfluenza vaccinationPregnant women

Identifiers

PMID33413252
PMCPMC7791889
OpenAlexW2909776224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.