Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33413241›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Knowledge of PEP and PrEP among people living with HIV/aids in Brazil.

Laelson Rochelle Milanês Sousa, Henrique Ciabotti Elias, Nilo Martinez Fernandes, Elucir Gir, Renata Karina Reis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. HIV and Substance Use in Latin America: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laelson Rochelle Milanês SousaDepartment of General and Specialized Nursing, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, R. Prof. Hélio Lourenço, 3900, Vila Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto, SP, CEP: 14040-902, Brazil. laelsonmilanes@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6018-5439
Henrique Ciabotti EliasDepartment of Nursing, Federal University of TriânguloMineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Nilo Martinez FernandesEvandro Chagas Clinical Research Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Elucir GirDepartment of General and Specialized Nursing, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, R. Prof. Hélio Lourenço, 3900, Vila Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto, SP, CEP: 14040-902, Brazil.
Renata Karina ReisDepartment of General and Specialized Nursing, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, R. Prof. Hélio Lourenço, 3900, Vila Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto, SP, CEP: 14040-902, Brazil.
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) and Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) are key to preventing sexual transmission of HIV, whose sexual partners are at high risk of acquiring HIV. We aimed to determine the factors associated with PrEP and PEP's knowledge as secondary prevention among people living with HIV/AIDS.

methodCross-sectional analytical study carried out among people living with HIV/AIDS treated at five specialized services in the city of Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil. Data were collected from July 2016 to July 2017. Individual interviews were conducted. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine factors associated with knowing PrEP and PEP.

resultsOf the 397 participants, 140 (35.26%) were heterosexual women aged 40 to 49 years (36.2%).Participants with less than 11 years of study (adjusted odds: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.13-0.60); who did not have a low viral load or did not know their viral load (adjusted odds: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.09-0.83) and those with casual partners (adjusted odds: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.09-0.83) were less likely to know about the PrEP. MSM (adjusted odds: 2.88; 95% CI: 1.59-5.3) and those who used alcohol during sexual intercourse (adjusted odds: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.0-2.8) were more likely to know about the PEP.

conclusionsThe knowledge about PEP and PrEP is low in Brazil. This may undermine secondary prevention efforts. Educational interventions to raise awareness of these prevention methods are needed among people living with HIV and who have HIV-negative sexual partners.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexual and Gender MinoritiesAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSexual PartnersAwarenessHIVPost-exposure prophylaxisPre-exposure prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID33413241
PMCPMC7788867
OpenAlexW3118306857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.