Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33413225›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

Obstetric and neonatal outcomes in women with pregnancy associated cancer: a population-based study in Lombardy, Northern Italy.

Giovanna Esposito, Matteo Franchi, Michela Dalmartello, Giovanna Scarfone, Eva Negri, Fabio Parazzini, Carlo La Vecchia, Giovanni Corrao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Subsequent pregnancies after a diagnosis of pregnancy-associated cancer.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Pregnancy-Associated Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giovanna EspositoNational Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Milan, Italy.
Matteo FranchiNational Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Milan, Italy.
Michela DalmartelloDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Giovanna ScarfoneDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Neonatology, University of Milan, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Eva NegriDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Fabio ParazziniDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy. fabio.parazzini@unimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5624-4854
Carlo La VecchiaDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni CorraoNational Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca 'PRIN' 2017, project 2017728JPK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnancy associated cancer (PAC) may lead to adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes. This study aims to assess the association between PACs and adverse perinatal outcomes [i.e. labor induction, iatrogenic delivery, preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA) newborn, low Apgar score, major malformations, perinatal mortality] in Lombardy, Northern Italy.

methodsThis population-based historic cohort study used the certificate of delivery assistance and the regional healthcare utilization databases of Lombardy Region to identify beneficiaries of National Health Service who delivered between 2008 and 2017. PACs were defined through oncological ICD-9-CM codes reported in the hospital discharge forms. Each woman with PAC was matched to four women randomly selected from those cancer-free (1:4). Log-binomial regression models were fitted to estimate crude and adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) of each perinatal outcome among PAC and cancer-free women.

resultsOut of the 657,968 deliveries, 831 PACs were identified (1.26 per 1000). PAC diagnosed during pregnancy was positively associated with labor induction or planned delivery (aPR=1.80, 95% CI: 1.57-2.07), cesarean section (aPR=1.78, 95% CI: 1.49-2.11) and premature birth (aPR=6.34, 95% CI: 4.59-8.75). No association with obstetric outcomes was found among PAC diagnosed in the post-pregnancy. No association of PAC, neither during pregnancy nor in post-pregnancy was found for SGA (aPR=0.71, 95% CI: 0.36-1.35 and aPR=1.04, 95% CI: 0.78-1.39, respectively), but newborn among PAC women had a lower birth weight (p-value< 0.001). Newborns of women with PAC diagnosed during pregnancy had a higher risk of borderline significance of a low Apgar score (aPR=2.65, 95% CI: 0.96-7.33) as compared to cancer-free women.

conclusionPAC, especially when diagnosed during pregnancy, is associated with iatrogenic preterm delivery, compromising some neonatal heath indicators.

Indexed as

Pregnancy Complications, NeoplasticPregnancy OutcomeAdolescentAdultApgar ScoreBirth WeightCesarean SectionCohort StudiesConfidence IntervalsDatabases, FactualDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansIatrogenic DiseaseInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeCancerNeonatal outcomePopulation-basedPregnancyPregnancy outcome

Identifiers

PMID33413225
PMCPMC7791735
OpenAlexW3092878110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.