Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33413142›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2021

General practitioners' deprescribing decisions in older adults with polypharmacy: a case vignette study in 31 countries.

Katharina Tabea Jungo, Sophie Mantelli, Zsofia Rozsnyai, Aristea Missiou, Biljana Gerasimovska Kitanovska, Birgitta Weltermann, Christian Mallen, Claire Collins, Daiana Bonfim, Donata Kurpas and 31 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

41 authors at 20 institutions in 28 countries.

Katharina Tabea JungoInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Sophie MantelliInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Zsofia RozsnyaiInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Aristea MissiouResearch Unit for General Medicine and Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Biljana Gerasimovska KitanovskaDepartment of Nephrology and Department of Family Medicine, University Clinical Centre, University St. Cyril and Metodius, Skopje, Macedonia.
Birgitta WeltermannInstitute for General Practice, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Christian MallenPrimary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG,, United Kingdom.
Claire CollinsIrish College of General Practitioners, Dublin, Ireland.
Daiana BonfimHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Donata KurpasFamily Medicine Department, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Ferdinando PetrazzuoliDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Centre for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Gindrovel DumitraRomanian Society of Family Medicine, Bucharest, Romania.
Hans ThulesiusDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Centre for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Heidrun LingnerHannover Medical School, Center for Public Health and Healthcare, Hannover, Germany.
Kasper Lorenz JohansenDanish College of General Practitioners, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Katharine WallisPrimary Care Clinical Unit, the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Kathryn HoffmannDepartment of General Practice and Family Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Lieve PeremansDepartment of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, University Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Liina PilvDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Marija Petek ŠterDepartment of Family Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Markus BleckwennDepartment of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Martin SattlerSSLMG, Societé Scientifique Luxembourgois en Medicine generale, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.
Milly van der PloegDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Péter TorzsaDepartment of Family Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Petra Bomberová KánskáDepartment of Social Medicine, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Shlomo VinkerDepartment of Family Medicine, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Radost AssenovaDepartment of Urology and General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Raquel Gomez BravoInstitute for Health and Behaviour, Research Unit INSIDE, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Rita P A ViegasFamily Doctor, Invited Assistant of the Department of Family Medicine, NOVA Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal.
Rosy TsopraINSERM, Université de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Information Sciences to support Personalized Medicine, F-75006, Paris, France.
Sanda Kreitmayer PesticFamily Medicine Department, Medical School, University of Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Sandra GintereFaculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Riga Stradiņs University, Riga, Latvia.
Tuomas H KoskelaClinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Vanja LazicDom zdravlja Zagreb - Centar, Zagreb, Croatia.
Victoria TkachenkoDepartment of Family Medicine, Institute of Family Medicine at Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Emily ReeveQuality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, UniSA: Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Clare LuymesDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Rosalinde K E PoortvlietDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Nicolas RodondiInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Jacobijn GusseklooDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Sven StreitInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. sven.streit@biham.unibe.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-3813-4616
University of Bern · CHLeiden University Medical Center · NLLund University · SECharles University · CZDalhousie University · CADanish College of General Practitioners · DKHospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BRInserm · FRKeele University · GBLeipzig University · DEMedical University of Vienna · ATMedical University Plovdiv · BGMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DERiga Stradiņš University · LVRomanian Society of Nephrology · ROSemmelweis University · HUShupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine · UATampere University · FITel Aviv University · ILThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaborations (West Midlands), the NIHR School for Primary Care Research and an NIHR Research Professorship in General Practice RP 2014-04-026Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 407440_167465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral practitioners (GPs) should regularly review patients' medications and, if necessary, deprescribe, as inappropriate polypharmacy may harm patients' health. However, deprescribing can be challenging for physicians. This study investigates GPs' deprescribing decisions in 31 countries.

methodsIn this case vignette study, GPs were invited to participate in an online survey containing three clinical cases of oldest-old multimorbid patients with potentially inappropriate polypharmacy. Patients differed in terms of dependency in activities of daily living (ADL) and were presented with and without history of cardiovascular disease (CVD). For each case, we asked GPs if they would deprescribe in their usual practice. We calculated proportions of GPs who reported they would deprescribe and performed a multilevel logistic regression to examine the association between history of CVD and level of dependency on GPs' deprescribing decisions.

resultsOf 3,175 invited GPs, 54% responded (N = 1,706). The mean age was 50 years and 60% of respondents were female. Despite differences across GP characteristics, such as age (with older GPs being more likely to take deprescribing decisions), and across countries, overall more than 80% of GPs reported they would deprescribe the dosage of at least one medication in oldest-old patients (> 80 years) with polypharmacy irrespective of history of CVD. The odds of deprescribing was higher in patients with a higher level of dependency in ADL (OR =1.5, 95%CI 1.25 to 1.80) and absence of CVD (OR =3.04, 95%CI 2.58 to 3.57).

interpretationThe majority of GPs in this study were willing to deprescribe one or more medications in oldest-old multimorbid patients with polypharmacy. Willingness was higher in patients with increased dependency in ADL and lower in patients with CVD.

Indexed as

DeprescriptionsGeneral PractitionersActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMultimorbidityPolypharmacyDeprescribingMultimorbidityOld agePolypharmacyPrimary health care

Identifiers

PMID33413142
PMCPMC7792080
OpenAlexW3118524992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.