Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33413137›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2021

Health professionals perception and beliefs about drug- related problems on polymedicated older adults- a focus group study.

Ana Isabel Plácido, Maria Teresa Herdeiro, João Lindo Simões, Odete Amaral, Adolfo Figueiras, Fátima Roque

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. How Portuguese Health Entities Used Social Media to Face the Public Health Emergency during COVID-19 Disease.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Isabel PlácidoResearch Unit for Inland Development, Polytechnic of Guarda (UDI-IPG), Avenida Dr. Francisco Sá Carneiro, n. ° 50, 6300-559, Guarda, Portugal.
Maria Teresa HerdeiroInstitute of Biomedicine (iBiMED) and Department of Medical Sciences, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
João Lindo SimõesInstitute of Biomedicine (iBiMED) and School of Health Sciences, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
Odete AmaralHealth Sciences School, Polytechnic of Viseu, R. D. João Crisostomo Gomes de Almeida, n.° 102, 3500-843, Viseu, Portugal.
Adolfo FigueirasDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Fátima RoqueResearch Unit for Inland Development, Polytechnic of Guarda (UDI-IPG), Avenida Dr. Francisco Sá Carneiro, n. ° 50, 6300-559, Guarda, Portugal. froque@ipg.pt.ORCID 0000-0003-0169-3788
University of Aveiro · PTInstituto Politécnico da Guarda · PTPolytechnic Institute of Viseu · PTUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESUniversity of Beira Interior · PT

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PTDC/MED-FAR/31598/2017Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SAICT-POL/23585/2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolymedicated older patients are at greater risk of suffering from adverse events. For this reason, the detection of both inappropriate polypharmacy and polypharmacy-associated Drug-Related Problems (DRPs) are essential to improve the health and wellbeing of older adults and to reduce healthcare costs. This work aims to explore health professionals' perceptions and opinions about polypharmacy and the handling of medicines by polymedicated older adults.

methodsThirteen focus groups with 94 health professionals (20 community pharmacists, 40 general practitioners and, 34 nurses) were conducted in primary healthcare centers of the center region of Portugal. Participants were asked to discuss their perceptions and beliefs concerning DRPs in polymedicated older adults. The sessions were audiotaped. After the transcription and coding of focus group sessions, a thematic analysis was done.

resultsThe following four main themes emerged from the 13 focus group sessions: poor compliance and polypharmacy- A perpetuated vicious cycle, organization of the healthcare system, interaction and communication between the health professionals, and strategies to prevent inappropriate polypharmacy.

conclusionsThe lack of both an efficient network of information and Interaction and communication between Health professionals makes the detection and/ or prevention of polypharmacy in older adults difficult. The implementation of new models to manage and/or prevent polypharmacy based on health professional perception and beliefs is essential to prevent DRPs and improve compliance among older adults.

Indexed as

Pharmaceutical PreparationsPolypharmacyAgedFocus GroupsHumansPerceptionPortugalPharmaceutical PreparationsDrug-related problemsHealth professionalsMedication managementOlder adultsPolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID33413137
PMCPMC7792196
OpenAlexW3120110543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.